Replies

To: ravingnutter; OXENinFLA; Txsleuth; Common Tator; Coop; ken5050; Peach; MEG33

You all will love this!

14 posted on 02/17/2006 1:33:16 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")

To: Carolinamom; ohioWfan; Peach; STARWISE; Wolfstar; txrangerette; hipaatwo

15 posted on 02/17/2006 1:35:55 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)

The interesting point is the New York Times believed it could get away with it. They are not only stuck on stupid they are stuck on yesterday's technology.

They are like a criminal that does not know about finger prints. For many decades they have pulled such tricks and gotten away with it. Now with the internet they cannot get away with it.

You would think they would not be such slow learners. You would think after the Rather/Mapes fiasco, they would understand they have to find new tricks. Bit it appears they have not developed new tricks because they never consider that the old tricks will no longer work. They obviously do not understand the nature of the internet.

Are these people really that stupid? They must be!

19 posted on 02/17/2006 2:00:51 PM PST by Common Tator

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794