Skip to comments.
California Democrats seek to make offshore drilling ban permanent
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^
| 2/17/06
| AP
Posted on 02/17/2006 12:07:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Craziness,, plain and simple.
To: NormsRevenge
And they'll be the first ones to bitch when gas prices go up again.
2
posted on
02/17/2006 12:09:35 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: dfwgator
And, should I say... Bush' fault ?
3
posted on
02/17/2006 12:10:52 PM PST
by
farlander
To: NormsRevenge
The only drilling I'm for is in my Senators heads to relive the pressure on the walnuts they call brains.
4
posted on
02/17/2006 12:12:03 PM PST
by
359Henrie
(NASA needs one more moon rock, its in Mecca.)
To: NormsRevenge
Corrected Headline:
"California Democrats seek to make high oil prices permanent"
5
posted on
02/17/2006 12:16:17 PM PST
by
Disambiguator
(Unfettered gun ownership is the highest expression of civil rights.)
To: NormsRevenge; All
Do they REALLY have any authority beyond the 3-mile limit?
6
posted on
02/17/2006 12:16:56 PM PST
by
FreeKeys
("The libs are in the business of giving strength and hope to our enemies." -- Jed Babbin)
To: FreeKeys
The resource limit is 200 miles.
7
posted on
02/17/2006 12:18:22 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: NormsRevenge
Permanent? as in beyond the next ice age?
8
posted on
02/17/2006 12:22:56 PM PST
by
rod1
To: NormsRevenge
"While we have all been well served by the bans on new coastal oil drilling for the last 25 years, these important protections are increasingly threatened," said Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara. "Enacting legislation that provides permanent protection for California is essential." I NEVER, EVER, want to hear these F'n people bitch about the price of oil again. NOT ONE PEEP.
If you Californians have a scintilla of common sense among you you will vote these b@st@rds out.
9
posted on
02/17/2006 12:23:06 PM PST
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: NormsRevenge
High Energy prices ? Blame Greenpeace.
10
posted on
02/17/2006 12:31:54 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: NormsRevenge
To: george76
High Energy prices ?
Blame Greenpeace. Why not blame the British Royal Family who funds them as major stockholders in BP?
12
posted on
02/17/2006 12:35:11 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
the British Royal Family funds Greenpeace ?
13
posted on
02/17/2006 12:39:20 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: NormsRevenge
...In addition, California Democrats propose shutting down all hydroelectric generation in the state.
And in a related move, California lawmakers propose making the exhalation of carbon dioxide a criminal offense.
14
posted on
02/17/2006 12:43:06 PM PST
by
aligncare
(Watergate killed journalism)
To: NormsRevenge
Why doesn't President Bush open these areas, including Alaska and the Gulf for drilling, by Executive Order, just like his predecessor closed some?
15
posted on
02/17/2006 12:43:09 PM PST
by
jeremiah
(The biggest threat to Americas survival today, meth usage.)
To: jeremiah
Love the idea. But I think President Bush plays by the rules and believes strongly in representative democracy; unlike the prior president.
16
posted on
02/17/2006 12:48:02 PM PST
by
aligncare
(Watergate killed journalism)
To: george76
Yup, so do a number of American Foundations. The Brits sometimes launder the money first through the World Wide Fund for Nature.
Enviro groups are hit men for those who would use them to control access to resources and create artificial scarcity. Consider this post for a description of how it worked in the California power crisis.
17
posted on
02/17/2006 12:58:40 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: jeremiah
Why doesn't President Bush open these areas, including Alaska and the Gulf for drilling, by Executive Order, just like his predecessor closed some? For the same reason he doesn't cancel Carter's EO banning nuclear fuel reprocessing: the people to whom we owe money wouldn't like that.
18
posted on
02/17/2006 1:00:10 PM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Carry_Okie
19
posted on
02/17/2006 1:03:29 PM PST
by
jeremiah
(The biggest threat to Americas survival today, meth usage.)
To: aligncare
But the process for shutting off drilling has nothing to do with legislatures, it has to do with unaccountable bureaucracies. If it is legal, do it, that is my motto.
20
posted on
02/17/2006 1:04:27 PM PST
by
jeremiah
(The biggest threat to Americas survival today, meth usage.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson