Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Flying Luxury Hotel
Popular Science ^ | 3/08/2006 | Joshua Tompkins

Posted on 03/08/2006 10:48:59 AM PST by Dallas59

Tomorrow's cruise ship will sail through the air, not the water

By Joshua Tompkins

John MacNeill LIFTOFF! On a pressurized plane, windows like these would explode outward . The Aeroscraft does not fly high enough to need pressurization.

This is not a Blimp. It's a sort of flying Queen Mary 2 that could change the way you think about air travel. It's the Aeroscraft, and when it's completed, it will ferry pampered passengers across continents and oceans as they stroll leisurely about the one-acre cabin or relax in their well-appointed staterooms.

Unlike its dirigible ancestors, the Aeroscraft is not lighter than air. Its 14 million cubic feet of helium hoist only two thirds of the craft's weight. The rigid and surprisingly aerodynamic body—driven by huge rearward propellers—generates enough additional lift to keep the behemoth and its 400-ton payload aloft while cruising. During takeoff and landing, six turbofan jet engines push the ship up or ease its descent.

This two-football-fields-long concept airship is the brainchild of Igor Pasternak, whose privately-funded California firm, Worldwide Aeros Corporation, is in the early stages of developing a prototype and expects to have one completed by 2010. Pasternak says several cruise ship companies have expressed interest in the project, and for good reason: The craft would have a range of several thousand miles and, with an estimated top speed of 174 mph, could traverse the continental U.S. in about 18 hours. During the flight, passengers would peer at national landmarks just 8,000 feet below or, if they weren't captivated by the view, the cavernous interior would easily accommodate such amenities as luxury staterooms, restaurants, even a casino.

To minimize noise, the aft-mounted propellers will be electric, powered by a renewable source such as hydrogen fuel cells. A sophisticated buoyancy-management system will serve the same purpose as trim on an airplane, allowing for precise adjustments in flight dynamics to compensate for outside conditions and passenger movement. The automated system will draw outside air into compartments throughout the ship and compress it to manage onboard weight.

The company envisions a cargo-carrying version that could deliver a store's worth of merchandise from a centralized distribution center straight to a Wal-Mart parking lot or, because the helium-filled craft will float, a year's worth of supplies to an offshore oil rig. "You can land on the snow, you can land on the water," Pasternak says. "It's a new vision of what can be done in the air."

Aeroscraft Purpose: Long-range travel for passengers who are more concerned with the journey than the destination Dimensions (feet): 165 h x 244 w x 647 l Max Speed: 174 mph Range: 6,000 miles Capacity: 250 passengers


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aeros; aerospace; armsdealer; biden; blimp; blimpdealer; joebiden; pasternak; sleepyjoe; walrus; worldwideaeros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last


How old is this prediction. Time for another walk around the block...
1 posted on 03/08/2006 10:49:01 AM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

New Orleans could use a couple of these........


2 posted on 03/08/2006 10:55:05 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

AirBus announces plans to build a bigger better one, cheaper


3 posted on 03/08/2006 10:55:17 AM PST by Waverunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Uh huh. I'm still waiting for my anti-grav belt and flying car.


4 posted on 03/08/2006 10:55:24 AM PST by WorkingClassFilth (Di'ver'si'ty (adj.): A compound word derived from the root words: division; perversion; adversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

That plane must be the flagship for Michael Moore Airlines.


5 posted on 03/08/2006 10:56:18 AM PST by Rebelbase (President Bush is a Texas jackass when it comes to Border security .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
The old 1950s era Flying Wing, developed by the military, though not as big could be modified to be similar. Because it is all flying surface it also had STAL capabilities.
6 posted on 03/08/2006 10:58:55 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Why is flying over the ocean at 8,000 feet more exciting than at 36,000 feet? Now, at 8 feet, its a different story.


7 posted on 03/08/2006 11:00:57 AM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Can't operate above severe weather, too slow to fly around it.

Bad Idea.


8 posted on 03/08/2006 11:03:15 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros at the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYFriend

8 feet at mach 3 even more exciting?


9 posted on 03/08/2006 11:03:54 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

"MobyAir", so I assume the flagship is the "Herman Melville"


10 posted on 03/08/2006 11:05:47 AM PST by ExcursionGuy84 ("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
No thanks.

I'll just cling to my trusty hover craft.
11 posted on 03/08/2006 11:06:05 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (No animals were harmed during the creation of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: WorkingClassFilth

"Uh huh. I'm still waiting for my anti-grav belt and flying car."

HERE HERE!

and head to toe FULL medical diagnostic beds,
and wearable computing devices that don't limit or cost an arm /leg,
and terraforming,
and molecular deposition manufacturing, and and and

guess we just gotta be patient.

Top sends


13 posted on 03/08/2006 11:08:13 AM PST by petro45acp (SUPPORT/BE YOUR LOCAL SHEEPDOG! ("On Sheep, Wolves, and Sheepdogs" by Dave Grossman))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: M. Dodge Thomas
too slow to fly around it

I can't think of any storms that moved 174 MPH.
14 posted on 03/08/2006 11:08:22 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (No animals were harmed during the creation of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Wow! This concept combines all of the bad features of both airplanes and airships.

First thunderstorm and everyone aboard is toast. Get airsick in an airplane? Wait until you get a ride on this baby! Will be like riding a nasty animal for 18 hours.

Like long trips? Crews that flew Navy blimps out of New Jersey in the 1950s always had to pack a bag in case they couldn't get back because of weather or wind speed. Their next stop after New Jersey was the Canary Islands, and if that didn't work, Africa!

Like inexperienced crews? There are no experienced dirigable pilots left (blimps are different). Your "captain" may have 300 hours flying time, if you're lucky.

Always wanted to be a test pilot? No problemo! EVERYONE aboard these death ships will be part of the test crew.

I can't wait to see one of these things fly...

15 posted on 03/08/2006 11:09:04 AM PST by pabianice (contact ebay??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

"I can't wait to see one of these things fly..."

It does seem as if such a huge and relatively slow aircraft would need a tremendous "margin of error" in the event of wind shear or other heavy turbulence, but they're not pressurized, so they're going to be flying at relatively low altitude. Which makes for quite an inticing (and easy) target for all those terminally-aggrieved groups to shoot down, too.


16 posted on 03/08/2006 11:16:57 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Gee . . . actually, I kinda like it.

I don't fly well--the idea of being in a big metal tube hurtling through the air at several hundred miles per hour five or six miles up in the sky does not appeal to me. My first (and last) flight some years ago was plagued by storms that made the plane lurch and bounce and the cabin lights flicker. Even this might not have been so bad had the stewardess, while telling us to put something or other in the upright position, not suddenly burst into tears and run away. This sort of thing makes one nervous, especially on a first flight.

When we were taking off or coming in for a landing, and I could see the ground just below us, I could think, "Okay, okay, now, if something went wrong, I could probably just jump and maybe land in that bush and . . . " The advantage of MobyAir is that you could spend the entire trip like that, looking for nice, soft places to land in case you had to jump out--and only 8000 feet to fall!

Yep, sign me up!

17 posted on 03/08/2006 11:32:50 AM PST by Dunstan McShane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
This time it may actually be a done deal, DOD says so...

First google "battle blimp" then " pasternak walrus pentagon"

Win or lose by Pasternak, we will see these in use by civilian companies eventually, CRAF companies are going to need some...too much defense money on the line to believe otherwise.

18 posted on 03/08/2006 11:39:25 AM PST by gnarledmaw (I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

How about tethering them a few hundred feet above the ground with some kind of ski lift -like way to get up or down... you could have a hotel in the sky ...


19 posted on 03/08/2006 12:00:30 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jasoncann
Hindenburg was filled with Hydrogen.

Aeroscraft is to be filled with Helium.

Compare and contrast. Pay particular attention to the chemical reactivity of each of those two elements.

20 posted on 03/08/2006 12:04:29 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson