To: SmithL
I guess the Congress is no longer involved in the budget process? So much for separate but equal branches.
4 posted on
03/12/2006 7:55:12 AM PST by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: Wasanother
I guess the Congress is no longer involved in the budget process? Do the phrases "new tone in Washington" and "no vetoes" mean anything to you?
20 posted on
03/12/2006 8:11:15 AM PST by
Moonman62
(Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
To: Wasanother
I guess the Congress is no longer involved in the budget process? Exactly. Is that bunch of bloated Pork Pig Republicans sending W an irresponsible spending package, and then daring him to veto his own party, and then blaming him for it?
224 posted on
03/12/2006 2:41:02 PM PST by
FlyVet
(Inherit the desolate heritages.)
To: Wasanother
Bush has a virginal veto pen. Why hang this all on CONgress?
257 posted on
03/12/2006 5:29:04 PM PST by
sauropod
("All you get is controversy, crap and confusion." Alan Simpson defining the WH Pimp Corps.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson