To: raybbr
Moving to stanch the damage, Bush called last week for Congress to grant him a line-item veto to prevent members from redirecting money in spending bills to their pet projects, a practice known as earmarking that has achieved notoriety under the GOP.
Six years too late!
Not to mention the huge waste of time and money. Why give Bush a line-item veto when he has yet to veto anything - line or otherwise??
74 posted on
03/12/2006 8:47:11 AM PST by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: DustyMoment
Line Item veto was already struck down as unconstitutional back in 1995 I think.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson