Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: FLASH: Big Bang Bonds Boom! There Is An Arnold/Fabian Deal...
LA Weekly - New West Notes ^ | March 13th, 2006 | Bill Bradley

Posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:28 PM PST by calcowgirl

FLASH: Big Bang Bonds Boom! There Is An Arnold/Fabian Deal. But No Puff Of White Smoke Over The Capitol Dome

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez have a deal on the Big Bang Bonds infrastructure package. But don’t pop those champagne corks — or do the Super Bowl gatorade dump — just yet.

From a variety of informed sources in the Democratic and Republican parties, I’ve learned that a marathon negotiating session between the two yesterday, followed by further talks (but no planned for Big Five meeting this morning due to lingering bad feelings), has resulted in agreement on a plan that is actually bigger than the one that lost on a party line vote in the state Senate late Friday night/early Saturday morning.

The package now is close to $50 billion. Which was, ironically, the very figure that Arnold tossed out there in the immediate aftermath of the special election last November. It is reportedly $660 million more than the deal voted down in the Senate; $400 million of that is for air pollution control.

There may be an Assembly vote on the plan today. Assuming, of course, there are Republican votes for the deal. There is no Senate session planned for this purpose.

So what is in it for Assembly Republicans, who have drawn “several lines in the sand” on the big bonds proposal? Pay as you go financing? No. Reform/undermining of the California Environmental Quality Act? No. (Although certain fast tracking would exist for levee repair and the like.) Undermining of labor’s prevailing wage legislation on big government projects? No. A relatively small bond package to exercise fiscal prudence? No.

What is there from a Republican standpoint is money for flood control and roads, more money for charter schools, and money for two dams. One would be the Perris Dam in Southern California, the other a choice between two sites in Northern California.

What’s in it for Democrats? Well, a great deal. More money for education, public transit, parks, and environmental programs. All of which Republicans have complained about as “extra” beyond basic infrastructure considerations.

All these things put together, of course, violate the California’s constitutional requirement that a ballot measure stick to a single topic. To solve that, Schwarzenegger and Democrats have come up with a companion measure, ACA (Assembly Constitutional Amendment) 10. But this is all coming together so late, so quickly, and in such secrecy, that the normal review of a constitutional amendment by the Legislative Analyst’s Office and the state Attorney General would be waived in the process.

EXCERPT - Continue to read...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: backroomdeals; bigbangbond; strategicgrowthplan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:33 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Amerigomag; SierraWasp; FairOpinion; doodlelady; ElkGroveDan; FOG724; Czar; ...

Bigger is better. /s


2 posted on 03/13/2006 12:36:56 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

3 posted on 03/13/2006 12:38:09 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

RINOs and RATS... There you have it. All feeding from the same trough.


4 posted on 03/13/2006 12:39:47 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Live - Bond Negotiation Update
by Jon Fleischman - Publisher
12:59 pmBlog Posts

Your FlashReport "cub reporter" is actually at the State Capitol today. I was going to search out someone that could give me an update on how the 'Big 5' negotiations are going on the BIG BOND$ Infrastructure Plan. Well, just now I stepped off of the elevator on the first floor of the Capitol, and found lead Assembly Republican negotiator on this package, Rick Keene.

To make a long story short, Keene was telling about 15 reporters that, despite good faith efforts by Governor Schwarzenegger, the Democrats continue to want to load up the package "like a Christmas tree loaded with ornaments" - Keene said that Republicans are still very interested in helping a common-sense infrastructure plan come forward, but that right now there is no agreement.

We'll see how it goes - but I am proud of Keene and our GOP legislators for holding a firm line for fiscal sanity!

5 posted on 03/13/2006 12:52:56 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Hey, Arnold... NO NEW TAXES--and cut the pork while you're at it.

From Friday night's "deal":

There shall be collected each year and in the same manner
and at the same time as other state revenue is collected, in
addition to the ordinary revenues of the state, a sum in an amount
required to pay the principal of, and interest on, the bonds each
year. It is the duty of all officers charged by law with any duty in
regard to the collection of the revenue to do and perform each and
every act that is necessary to collect that additional sum.

6 posted on 03/13/2006 1:01:03 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Mercy!


7 posted on 03/13/2006 1:02:36 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (RINOs: The OTHER white meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Its a deal only between the Governor and the Democrats. I don't see why Republicans should vote for it? What does give us? NOTHING. On the other hand, its a gravy train full of Lefty goodies for the Democrats. Those are two good reasons for Republicans to hold the line and vote against it despite the pressure from the Administration, the Democrats, the Wilsonegger Gang and the MSM that's certain to come.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

8 posted on 03/13/2006 1:06:00 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

Time to call the Republican legislators and tell them they have our FULL support to shut this farce down! And that those who don't will also see our wrath! These back room deals by the Wilsonegger gang and Susan Kennedy will be our demise.


9 posted on 03/13/2006 1:08:03 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I am proud of Keene and our GOP legislators for holding a firm line for fiscal sanity!

Don't be too proud yet. California Republicans have a long history of cracking their unity just enough to peel off the requisite number of legislators to pass a deal. With a "Republican" governor applying pressure and offering incentives, it won't take much to get this bond on the ballot. Arnold is desperate to have a signature issue to take to the voters to boost his re-election prospects.

10 posted on 03/13/2006 1:08:25 PM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its a deal only between the Governor and the Democrats.

Prop 57/58 was another one of these backroom deals between the Democrats and the Governor. It did not have majority Republican support. It squeaked out only the few votes it needed from a few weak-kneed legislators who bowed to the pressure from the Administration. Let's let them know that we are watching... and they better stand firm!

11 posted on 03/13/2006 1:10:33 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
I am told that one of the "concessions" was that Republicans could have two water storage projects (i.e. dams), but the devil was in the details. Apparently after submitting all the specs on the dams (several months from now) they would still require a 2/3 vote of the legislature.

Dick Ackerman was born at night, but not last night. ...as if they would honor that pledge.

The dumbest part is that if you have 2/3 votes for ANYTHING in the legislature you can do whatever you want. Where is the concession in this deal? The real con game was never practice as such an art, as it is here in Sacramento.

12 posted on 03/13/2006 1:11:50 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

This thing is outrageous! Instead of ANY acknowledgement of the need to limit the regulations to get something built, now they're pumping in new requirements, including paying for contractors to retrofit their construction equipment to limit "greenhouse gases." These people live in some alternative universe (I'm watching the session on TV).

Kuehl: "Deferred Maintenance" is where you actually build something but "Natural Infrastructure" is an important part of life.

UGH!


13 posted on 03/13/2006 1:22:44 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Ooops... I thought it was live but what I'm watching is a replay from March 8th.
(But they sound just as idiotic, whether real-time or not!)


14 posted on 03/13/2006 1:35:44 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Yeah you sort of startled me there. The Assembly and Senate are supposed to go into session at 2:00, though I would venture the Senate gets put off for an hour, and then another hour.

I'll let you all know here.

15 posted on 03/13/2006 1:53:48 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Ahh Fabian ... dreamy ...

16 posted on 03/13/2006 2:00:03 PM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

>>Yeah you sort of startled me there.

It's a blond thing ;-)

>>I'll let you all know here.

Thanks! Appreciate it.


17 posted on 03/13/2006 2:00:37 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Please attach me to your ping list for notification of the outcome. Thanks.


18 posted on 03/13/2006 2:17:21 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

I haven't had a ping list since November of 2002, but I'll let you know if I hear anything.


19 posted on 03/13/2006 2:39:42 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Thank you. I'd appreciate the call.

Right now spending time trying to resolve William S. Chambers, a railroad switchman/brakeman from Placer, who is the other candidate qualified to run in the Republican gubernatorial primary. He received 609 vites for governor in October 2003.

20 posted on 03/13/2006 2:53:59 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson