Posted on 03/17/2006 2:29:04 PM PST by Crackingham
And now, polygamy.
With the sweetly titled HBO series "Big Love," polygamy comes out of the closet. Under the headline "Polygamists, Unite!" Newsweek informs us of "polygamy activists emerging in the wake of the gay-marriage movement." Says one evangelical Christian big lover: "Polygamy rights is the next civil-rights battle."
Polygamy used to be stereotyped as the province of secretive Mormons, primitive Africans and profligate Arabs. With "Big Love" it moves to suburbia as a mere alternative lifestyle.
As Newsweek notes, these stirrings for the mainstreaming of polygamy (or, more accurately, polyamory) have their roots in the increasing legitimization of gay marriage. In an essay 10 years ago, I pointed out that it is utterly logical for polygamy rights to follow gay rights. After all, if traditional marriage is defined as the union of (1) two people of (2) opposite gender, and if, as advocates of gay marriage insist, the gender requirement is nothing but prejudice, exclusion and an arbitrary denial of one's autonomous choices in love, then the first requirement -- the number restriction (two and only two) -- is a similarly arbitrary, discriminatory and indefensible denial of individual choice.
This line of argument makes gay activists furious. I can understand why they do not want to be in the same room as polygamists. But I'm not the one who put them there. Their argument does. Blogger and author Andrew Sullivan, who had the courage to advocate gay marriage at a time when it was considered pretty crazy, has called this the "polygamy diversion," arguing that homosexuality and polygamy are categorically different because polygamy is a mere "activity" while homosexuality is an intrinsic state that "occupies a deeper level of human consciousness."
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
One wife is more than enough for me.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
I'd like to introduce this guy to my ex-mother-in-law. She could disabuse him of such silly ideas.
I thought the pilot was pretty good.
Stinking polygaphobe! ;-)
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
I say, that does kind of defeat the point of the practice, now does'nt it? ;-)
Hmmm.
Polygamy is not as disturbing as gay marriage, mostly because the whole thought of what Arabs get to do with their harems is naughty but pleasant, whereas the thought...well, you get the picture.
Unless the household is totally dominated by the man it is a recipe for disaster. Polygamy might work in cultures like Islam or those in the Old Testament where women have no rights but it can never work in a society that has equality of the sexes.
"Polygamy might work in cultures like Islam or those in the Old Testament where women have no rights but it can never work in a society that has equality of the sexes."
Nope.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Best arguement for polygamy:
If Heather can have two mommies ... then why can't she have two or even three mommies and a daddy??
Best arguement against Polygamy:
"What do you mean, both of you will carry my credit cards??"
Best arguement for polygany (multiple men, one woman):
"Goodie .. now I will have two men to pay my credit card bills!"
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Wrong. Poly means many. Gyn is the root for woman as in gynecology. Polygyny is many wives(women). Polygamy just means many mates. Polyandry is many men (andros).
...or between a man and hid dog. or alligator.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.