Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Vendetta Behind 'V for Vendetta' (writer of comic weighs in on the movie)
The NY Times ^ | March 12, 2006 | David Itzkoff

Posted on 03/20/2006 7:47:23 AM PST by Chiapet

THE most vivid characters in Alan Moore's graphic novels are antiheroes of ambiguous morality and identity: costumed avengers like Rorschach, the disturbed street vigilante of "Watchmen," or the crusader known only by the letter V, who commits catastrophic acts of terrorism in the dystopian tale "V for Vendetta."

With inventions like these, and a body of writing that spans nearly three decades, Mr. Moore, a 52-year-old native of Northampton, England, distinguished himself as a darkly philosophical voice in the medium of comic books — a rare talent whose work can sell solely on the strength of his name. But if Mr. Moore had his way today, his name would no longer appear on almost any of the graphic novels with which he is most closely associated. "I don't want anything more to do with these works," he said in a recent telephone interview, "because they were stolen from me — knowingly stolen from me."

In Mr. Moore's account of his career, the villains are clearly defined: they are the mainstream comics industry — particularly DC Comics, the American publisher of "Watchmen" and "V for Vendetta" — which he believes has hijacked the properties he created, and the American film business, which has distorted his writing beyond recognition. To him, the movie adaptation of "V for Vendetta," which opens on Friday, is not the biggest platform yet for his ideas: it is further proof that Hollywood should be avoided at all costs. "I've read the screenplay," Mr. Moore said. "It's rubbish."

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alanmoore; v; vforvendetta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
Alan Moore wrote the original comic. The article is less about the movie, and more about him.
1 posted on 03/20/2006 7:47:26 AM PST by Chiapet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chiapet
To him, the movie adaptation of "V for Vendetta," which opens on Friday, is not the biggest platform yet for his ideas: it is further proof that Hollywood should be avoided at all costs. "I've read the screenplay," Mr. Moore said. "It's rubbish."

Even the NY Times pannned the flick. Said it should have been titled 'Natalie Portman gets a haircut'!

2 posted on 03/20/2006 7:54:22 AM PST by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet
We went to see "V" with an expert in the genre. His conclusion was that most of the political tripe was filtered out of the movie, the special effects were spectacular, and left unexplained is why "V" happened to have immediate access to one of the Grand Chancellor's underground torture chambers.

Also, all (not some, but all) of the principal characters were identified at one point or the other as being homosexual.

3 posted on 03/20/2006 7:54:44 AM PST by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I'll be damned if the villain isn't dressed to look like an Orthodox Jew, and I wonder who is responsible for that.


4 posted on 03/20/2006 7:57:00 AM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

V sucked. It was pro-terrorist, pro-Gay, and anti-Christian. 'Nuff said.


5 posted on 03/20/2006 7:58:26 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81; Chiapet

It was also anti-american. Almost forgot...


6 posted on 03/20/2006 7:58:52 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan
Even the NY Times panned the flick. Said it should have been titled 'Natalie Portman gets a haircut'!

I know, it's really sad. I have the comics, and although a lot of people say that Moore was writing against Thatcher's England in them, I didn't think that was obvious from the writing. It was less contextualized, and was more of a general dystopia. Alan Moore is kind of an oddball, but he's a great comic writer.

7 posted on 03/20/2006 7:58:52 AM PST by Chiapet (Uncle Sam wants You! (to buy more magnetic car ribbons....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

So the truth is out. It's not as much that he disagrees with the movie (which he never states) but that he feels DC took the rights from him and he's going to badmouth anything about any movies that come from his comics.


8 posted on 03/20/2006 7:58:58 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I think Moore is a Druid and doesn't like the way Christianity has treated his religion.


9 posted on 03/20/2006 7:59:06 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet
"I've read the screenplay," Mr. Moore said. "It's rubbish."

But his comic isn't? Oh yeah right.

And look, representative and symbolic, the NY Times does a serious long article on what? Comic book garbage.

Typical mindset. They take comic books seriously but think they can muckrack about Abu Grahb or other things and control events with their influence and power and bring down a president (as they plan).

Idiots.

10 posted on 03/20/2006 7:59:31 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I think Moore is a Druid and doesn't like the way Christianity has treated his religion.

Loony Toones. Cukoo cukoo.

11 posted on 03/20/2006 8:00:07 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I think Moore is a Druid and doesn't like the way Christianity has treated his religion.

Perhaps he does feel this way. I'll have to file that under my 'I don't give a flying monkey crap' folder.
12 posted on 03/20/2006 8:00:34 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

Moore's work is quite literary actually. The Watchmen won the Hugo award.


13 posted on 03/20/2006 8:01:16 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Terry Gilliam was set to direct it. Too bad it never haappened.


14 posted on 03/20/2006 8:09:11 AM PST by Rocko (Liberals -- they have a compassion you always hear about, but never witness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rocko

He's done this already (Brazil) but that would really have been something.


15 posted on 03/20/2006 8:11:51 AM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I think Moore is a Druid and doesn't like the way Christianity has treated his religion.

Loony Toones. Cukoo cukoo.

Well, it does seem to be the nuttiest among us who end up being the most brilliant writers. Think Faulkner and Hemingway...

16 posted on 03/20/2006 8:12:49 AM PST by Chiapet (Uncle Sam wants You! (to buy more magnetic car ribbons....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

Why does the NY Times neglect to explain why Moore thinks the screenplay is "rubbish"?

The story notes that he is not shy about expressing his opinion, but then only alludes to his negative feelings towards "V for Vendetta" without providing any specifics...


17 posted on 03/20/2006 8:15:47 AM PST by Thrusher ("...there is no peace without victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
I'll be damned if the villain isn't dressed to look like an Orthodox Jew, and I wonder who is responsible for that.

The mask is a Guy Fawkes mask... Guy Fawkes is/was Catholic.

18 posted on 03/20/2006 8:19:00 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

Portman should have retired after The Professional & Heat.
Knightly on the other hand, exhibits great range and shows lots of promise. IMHO


19 posted on 03/20/2006 8:27:02 AM PST by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

I suspect that if most of us were examined as meticulously as most people worthy of fame and honor, we would all be considered eccentric


20 posted on 03/20/2006 8:27:33 AM PST by Sensei Ern (Now, IB4Z! http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy/ "I believe Hillary is the aunti-christ.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson