what i conclude is not that important. i pretty much assume saddam had wmd, based on his behavior in the past, and based on the events leading up to the invasion. it would be hard for me to be un-convinced of this.
the more crucial issue, in my mind, is having enough evidence to convince the American public, in Nov. 2006 and in Nov. 2008, that he had these weapons.
if this document was captured from Iraqi intelligence, and if it refers to offensive chemical weapons, it could be extremely helpful.
I would have to say that the debate over this issue was settled in the 2004 election when W won re-election.
I point to illegal immigration being the forfront issue for '06 and '08.
Basically, I contend that the American left shot the wad with " no WMD" and "Bush lies" trying to oust W in 2004. They missed their target by a mile and they are out of amunition.
I predict that the left will finally 'admit' that opposition without solution has failed them and they will turn to the illegal labor force for votes to take control of anything they can get their hands on in the next two elections. But I also predict they will fail as miserably as they have since 2000.