Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44; jveritas
The problem with writing off a defensive chemical unit as irrelevant to the question of chemical weapons use is that such defensive provisions are necessary to have if an army intends to use them.
64 posted on 03/25/2006 12:25:44 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

Sorry...

There are dozens of militaries all over the world that have no chemical weapons, but have chemical decontamination units and vehicles just like this Iraqi unit.

Keep in mind Iran has chemical weapons, and has used them, in the Iran-Iraq war (in smaller quantities than Iraq, but it still happened.)

I realize people desperately want to believe otherwise but reality has to be faced on this one. No particularly interesting smoking gun here.


66 posted on 03/25/2006 12:31:49 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

Or you are afraid a neighbor (e.g., Iran) would use them on you.


67 posted on 03/25/2006 12:32:36 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

Exactly right.


107 posted on 03/25/2006 2:32:34 PM PST by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson