[drhogan]

"This document is a clear indication that Saddam never stopped his WMD program at least up to the year 2001 as the document show because there was still and active Chemical Platoon in Al Qadisia Air base. "

---

this is a quotation from the original post. there are a number of issues here, if we are talking about clear indication of wmd.
in any science, when a claim is made about evidence, it is considered to be reasonable to ask questions about the evidence.
if you don't establish the validity of the evidence, anybody can claim anything. then it just becomes political, with two groups arguing, but with no way to resolve the question.

[justa-hairyape]

You cannot use documents to prove someone disarmed and destroyed their WMD.
You cannot use documents to prove someone possessed or utilized their WMD.
You CAN use documents to prove someone was telling lies about either disarming, destroying, possessing or utilizing.
The validity of these documents will need to be cross checked and verified. What we do here is discovery and conjecture. We don't have a staff.

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

I think you are running way ahead of the effort,....I think there are 48,000 boxs of documents to be translated....making sense of each and every document will come later,....