No smoking gun here..close but no.
Agreed.....I doubt one document would have a smoking gun, they probably made sure they destroyed the cache of such,....but by inference we can get some ideas,....course the MSM will be working hard to prove otherwise....
I'd be very surprised if we found a smoking gun. Unless there's a handwritten note to Saddam that says something like, "Take the WMDs here" with a hand-drawn map showing a road to Syria, I doubt we'll get a "smoking gun." These documents, taken in their totality, are continuing to bolster what most of us agree was a good cause to begin with ... the invasion and regime change in Iraq. The preponderance of the evidence continues to mount, and the smoking gun is the documents as a whole.
And the Administration just continues to ignore this evidence, that their original assertion that Saddam has chemical weapons ready to use was correct. Condi Rice on Fox News Sunday said, in response to a Chris Wallace question(parphrasing) even though there were no WMD, other reasons justified us going after Saddam.
Not even a qualification by her, straight out "there were no WMD". Why do they continue to ignore the evidence in front of their faces? There were none found, but that was because in the ramp up to war Saddam, in cooperation with other nations, namely the Russians or Russian rogue operatives, and maybe France, moved those weapons, most assuredly to Syria.
Just doesn't make sense that why Bush et.al continue to deny the evidence.