Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC Won't Regulate Internet Politics
BreitBart.com ^ | March 27, 2006 | David Pace

Posted on 03/27/2006 9:26:30 AM PST by Quilla

The Federal Election Commission decided Monday that the nation's new campaign finance law will not apply to most political activity on the Internet.

In a 6-0 vote, the commission decided to regulate only paid political ads placed on another person's Web site.

The decision means that bloggers and online publications will not be covered by provisions of the new election law. Internet bloggers and individuals will therefore be able to use the Internet to attack or support federal candidates without running afoul of campaign spending and contribution limits.

"It's a win, win, win," Commissioner Ellen L. Weintraub said, adding that the rule would satisfy concerns of campaigns, individuals and the Internet community about whether the campaign finance law applies to Internet political activity.

The commission was forced to act after a federal court ruled that the FEC must extend some of the campaign financial and spending limits to political activity on the Internet.

The 2002 law requires that campaign ads for federal candidates be paid for with money regulated by the law, which limits contributions by individuals to $2,000 and bans union and corporation donations.

In its initial interpretation of the law in 2002, the FEC said no political activity on the Internet was covered. But a federal court judge ruled in 2004 that the commission had to craft a new rule that at the very least covered paid political advertising on the Internet.

The ruling, and the commission's decision not to appeal it, sparked fears among some Internet users that the panel might adopt broader restrictions. But FEC Chairman Michael E. Toner said the new rules give a "categorical and unqualified" exemption for all individual and group political activity on the Internet, except for paid advertising.

"The law was never intended to regulate private citizen communication on the Internet," said Commission Vice Chairman Robert D. Lenhard. "I believe that we have achieved that goal today."

Commissioners said the new rule also specifically changes several other FEC regulations to make it clear that Internet activity, such as blogging, e-mail communications and online publications, is not covered by the campaign law.

For example, the rule says individuals can use union or corporate computers or other electronic devices for political activity, as long they do it on their own time and are not coerced to engage in such activity by the union or corporation.

Bloggers would be entitled to the same exemption from the campaign finance law that newspapers and other traditional forms of media receive.

"There will be no second class citizens among members of the media," Toner said.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; cfr; fec; firstamendment; internet; kollarkotelly; mccain; moron; tyranny; weblogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2006 9:26:34 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

PINGing the good news to Jim! :)


2 posted on 03/27/2006 9:27:53 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Whhhhoooooooo Hooooooooo!


3 posted on 03/27/2006 9:28:28 AM PST by 4CJ (Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito, qua tua te fortuna sinet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Thanks, I was just about to.


4 posted on 03/27/2006 9:28:31 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

Finally!


5 posted on 03/27/2006 9:29:29 AM PST by b4its2late (There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Looks like we dodged the bullet.


6 posted on 03/27/2006 9:29:46 AM PST by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

No doubt Senators Clinton and McCain are working on alternative legislation to put a gatekeeper in position before the 08 elections.

Hey, what's Jamie Gorelick doing these days? She sure came through in deflecting the 9-11 Commission away from the Clinton Administration. And she was instrumental in building the wall between the CIA and FBI. Imagine how effective she could be an the gatekeeping Commissioner of the Internet.


7 posted on 03/27/2006 9:30:18 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Great news for everybody.


8 posted on 03/27/2006 9:30:55 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

I never believed this was applicable to FR since it has never endorsed candidates or parties per se.


9 posted on 03/27/2006 9:31:05 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

*squeak!

Reminiscences of lurking during the 2000 election season.....


10 posted on 03/27/2006 9:31:27 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
This isn't good news. The FEC is trying to establish the principle the Internet can be regulated by the federal government. It can withdraw the so-called exemption later. After all, its just a rule.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

11 posted on 03/27/2006 9:31:56 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
ALL the no-speech six months before rules should be stricken from the books! The FEC probably wants to regulate the web, but couldn't figure out how... Or perhaps they have decided to do little by little. After all, didn't this article say they decided FOR regulating paid ads on the internet? Sorry all, but I cannot leave this post without underdcoring that our own president signed the original monstrosity McCain-Feingold... Shame on all involved in this.
12 posted on 03/27/2006 9:32:23 AM PST by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
Looks like we dodged the bullet.

I'd say the FEC dodged a firestorm.

13 posted on 03/27/2006 9:32:34 AM PST by ItsForTheChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Sounds like Soros and Co. and the MoveOn.org crowd just made a huge payout to the FEC.


14 posted on 03/27/2006 9:32:48 AM PST by poobear (Islam - A Global Lynch Mob !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

bump


15 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:12 AM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; Jim Robinson

I take it FR does not accept paid political ads then? Note that the decision still means that bloggers and online publications WILL be covered by provisions of the new election law if they accept paid political ads.


16 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:15 AM PST by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

The whooshing sound you hear is the air going out of the McCain Express '08 (thank goodness).


17 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:34 AM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

i'll be happier when the 60 day before an election free speech leash from mccain feingold is killed.


18 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:34 AM PST by Psalm_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"The law was never intended to regulate private citizen communication on the Internet,"
Tell that to Sen. Insane McCain.
19 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:44 AM PST by peyton randolph (As long is it does me no harm, I don't care if one worships Elmer Fudd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla

This is worded funny.

Anyone know what this REALLY says?

It said paid political ads.

Wouldn't that still include blogs and forums that receive donations?

Because a donation to a blog to write something can be seen as an ad.


20 posted on 03/27/2006 9:33:44 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson