Skip to comments.
Fight the mobile phone invasion at 30,000ft
Financial Times ^
| 3/28/2006
| Jagdish Bhagwati
Posted on 03/29/2006 7:39:52 AM PST by tellw
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: LIConFem
>i>"Yet no one ever says a word to the rude people who talk loudly while NOT on their cell phone."
I once had a group of small children sitting behind me kicking the seat, while their parents sat peacefully up in First Class. I got up and told the flight attendant to get these children under their parents' control. They made the parents come back and sit with the kids. Guess where? In my seat, and I was moved up to First Class in THEIR seat!
To: tellw
It's obvious this guy hasn't been talking to conspiracy-theorist Charlie Sheen-han. Everyone knows cellphones don't work at 30,000 feet. /sarcasm.
22
posted on
03/29/2006 8:00:29 AM PST
by
Sisku Hanne
(Happy 2006...The Year of the Black Conservative!)
To: tellw
I practice the Flight Free Lifestyle and drive my comfortable old Lincoln where ever I need to go or choose to roam. Packed like a sardine in an aluminum cylinder filled with miscelaneous rifraff practicing no end of obnoxious habits and producing odious smells is no way to travel. And that's first class. Tourist I don't even like to think about. And don't get me started on the cacotopia of the modern airport.
23
posted on
03/29/2006 8:01:10 AM PST
by
NaughtiusMaximus
(DO NOT read to the end of this tagline . . . Oh, $#@%^, there you went and did it.)
To: kerryusama04
Beamer used a GTE airphone. See
here
24
posted on
03/29/2006 8:02:41 AM PST
by
tellw
To: kerryusama04
The directv antennae are phased array attenae as I understand it, and look up to the satellites.
I am suprised to hear that cell phones will work in a jet aircraft (1) due to speed of handoff between towers, and (2) lack of signal from and to the towers.
I am curious.
Anyway, Mr. or Ms. Rude's cell phone will not work at FL35 over the Kansas. Or am I wrong?
25
posted on
03/29/2006 8:02:52 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: whitedog57
I carry a jammer for theaters, restaurants and the like. Illegal as all hell and dangerous for airplanes (never used it on one) but hey nobody lives forever.
So, if you go somewhere with lots of bars but your calls keep dropping, catch a hint and lower your voice. ;-)
26
posted on
03/29/2006 8:05:22 AM PST
by
glorgau
To: tellw
27
posted on
03/29/2006 8:06:26 AM PST
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitor)
To: TommyDale
You were lucky! :o)
I take a train to and from work every day. Last Friday afternoon, there was a spanish-speaking gentleman on my train who was talking rather loudly on his cell phone for nearly the entire trip. A few stations before mine, a man got up to leave. As he was walking past the phone-talker, he yelled something like, "No one wants to hear your conversations, you f$ckin' a$$hole". Sitting two rows in front of him was another man with his young (grade-school age) daugher. People applauded.
I don't condone excessive cell-phone use in restaurants, trains, planes, et cetera. But the level of phoney righteous indignation exhibited by some folks is ridiculous, and largely (IMO) the result of group-think.
28
posted on
03/29/2006 8:07:52 AM PST
by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: tellw
I don't know about allowing cell phones, but we need to allow internet access so we can do e-mail and research as needed.
29
posted on
03/29/2006 8:08:04 AM PST
by
HOYA97
(Hoya Saxa = What Rocks)
To: AnotherUnixGeek
...I believe Ted Olson's wife (forgot her name) did use a cell phone from the back of her plane...Barbara, I think; God bless her.
30
posted on
03/29/2006 8:08:46 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?")
To: tellw
This guy has no reason to complain, as his normal posture shields his ears quite effectively.
31
posted on
03/29/2006 8:10:02 AM PST
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: JimRed
Barbara, yes, who was supposed to go on her trip the previous day but stayed home so she could start September 11 with her husband - since it was his birthday! :-[
To: tellw
Why is this idiot so worried about this? considering the background noise in an airplane, I wear ear plugs against the jet engine noise. Some retard on a cell phone is not going to bother me. Besides, headphones with music will drown out a caller as well.
33
posted on
03/29/2006 8:10:39 AM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Islam's true face: http://makeashorterlink.com/?J169127BC)
To: safisoft
I laugh everytime I read one of these whinning pieces about cell phones in aircraft. The simply truth is, they will only work for about 5 minutes before landing or about 3 minutes after takeoff. Next time you fly, turn your cell phone on you moron - see? No signal. Sheesh.
I've noted the same thing.
How did all those calls come from FLT 93?
34
posted on
03/29/2006 8:11:23 AM PST
by
null and void
(Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
To: tellw
The smoking ban on all flights came along when the science behind the problem of secondary harm from smoking became well-established.I call BS on this statement.
In the topic of the article, I learned long ago to shut out distractions from others as needed.
Let the cell phone users jabber in the cabin. It won't disturb my sleep.
35
posted on
03/29/2006 8:11:56 AM PST
by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: safisoft
I laugh everytime I read one of these whinning pieces about cell phones in aircraft. The simply truth is, they will only work for about 5 minutes before landing or about 3 minutes after takeoff.What makes this debate possible is that the airlines want to put their own cell antenna on the plane to make it possible for the entire flight.
36
posted on
03/29/2006 8:12:19 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: tellw
I've always been told that cellphones and wireless devices mess up the airplanes electronics. How come, all of a sudden, it's going to be OK?
37
posted on
03/29/2006 8:14:03 AM PST
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: null and void
Next time you fly, turn your cell phone on you moron - see? No signal. Sheesh.
I've noted the same thing. How did all those calls come from FLT 93? Obviously, this proves that the DUmmie LIHOP/MIHOP conspiracy theories must be true. [ /SARCASM ]
38
posted on
03/29/2006 8:14:10 AM PST
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: AnotherUnixGeek; BKO
However, I believe Ted Olson's wife (forgot her name) did use a cell phone from the back of her plane, where she and her fellow passengers had been herded by the hijackers.FReeper Barbara K Olson, BKO...
39
posted on
03/29/2006 8:14:20 AM PST
by
null and void
(Perhaps hating America is for those for whom hating Jews just isn't enough. - Philippe Roger)
To: Centurion2000
considering the background noise in an airplane...It means that cell phone users will be yelling into their phones instead of talking, and those passengers seated near engines will be screaming into their phones.
Kind of like most Nextel users.
40
posted on
03/29/2006 8:14:40 AM PST
by
kaboom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson