Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius

Northridge was only 6.7? I thought it was more. :-P


21 posted on 03/30/2006 10:02:44 PM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers

It was 6.7, but it was shallow, which made it very destructive. I lived through the 6.8 here in Seattle five years ago. That one was deep, so it did much less damage.


22 posted on 03/30/2006 10:05:05 PM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers

Northridge was indeed "just" Magnitude 6.7

Keep in mind the energy release, and thus destructive power of a quake, goes up 1.4 times for each .1 magnitude, 3 times for each .3 magnitude, 5.5 times for each .5 magnitude, and 32 times for each full magnitude point.

Northridge was 32 times more powerful than this quake in Iran, for example.

The biggest credible quake you could get directly under LA is in the 7.2 to 7.4 range, or upwards of of 5+ times more powerful than Northridge.


23 posted on 03/30/2006 10:06:20 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson