[LurkingSince'98]

you stated you didn't think "that what the patent described is really innovative concept."

It is not you that made the decision to grant the patent, it was the USPTO. Unless you have read the patent and can point out the obvious deficiencies, you're just guessing.

Obviously, if some judge is going to grant them $5 mil they were on to something.

Lurking'

[evilC]

If the patent was legally granted (even if it was "bad") then I can see a judge wanting to enforce it. I am not sure that it means for sure that the judge thought it a worthy patent (as you pointed out that is the job of the USPTO).