To: Pelham
Sorry... the South lost. That's what happens to losers in war - they get hurt. It can't be any other way.
Was Shock and Awe immoral in Iraq because innocent people were killed? Was the bombing of Dresden (a case of arson far worse than anything Sherman did) immoral?
No... there should be no expectation that a war will be fought gently.
To: Bubbatuck
So what was that pap about mailice toward none and charity for all about?
ML/NJ
23 posted on
03/31/2006 7:24:45 PM PST by
ml/nj
To: Bubbatuck
Sorry... the South lost. That's what happens to losers in war - they get hurt. It can't be any other way. Hey, you've convinced me- I'm an ends-justifies-the-means kinda guy, and Might does make Right. And if it doesn't, who the hell cares? The other side are Losers.
27 posted on
03/31/2006 7:31:33 PM PST by
Pelham
(Treason: Not just for Democrats anymore)
To: Bubbatuck
The bombing of Dresden was immoral. City = target, great swaths of the city together with its population indiscriminately incinerated. God will judge. It doesn't matter who does it. It's wrong.
35 posted on
03/31/2006 7:40:43 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
(There is no fear of God before their eyes.)
To: Bubbatuck
Was the bombing of Dresden (a case of arson far worse than anything Sherman did) immoral? Of course. You defend that????
52 posted on
03/31/2006 8:26:22 PM PST by
AlexandriaDuke
(Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
To: Bubbatuck
No... there should be no expectation that a war will be fought gently.
One of the downfalls of the south was that Lee refused to fight the war as dirty as the Union was fighting it. He missed opportunities because of it.
200 posted on
04/03/2006 7:23:35 AM PDT by
JamesP81
(Ignorance of the 10th Amendment should disqualify a person from holding office or being a teacher)
To: Bubbatuck
Yes, Dresden was immoral. Mass, intentional murder of babies always is.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson