Skip to comments.
Ahmadinejad: Iran to make nuclear declaration shortly
Iran Focus ^
| April 10 2006
Posted on 04/10/2006 11:07:52 AM PDT by jmc1969
Iran’s hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday that the Islamic Republic would give soon give “good news” about its nuclear advancements, the official state news agency reported.
The United Nations Security Council adopted a “Presidential Statement” unanimously on March 29 giving Iran 30 days to suspend all of its uranium enrichment activities and resume its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency.
(Excerpt) Read more at iranfocus.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; gecko; geiko; goodnews; iran; iranbombing; iraniangecko; irannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
04/10/2006 11:07:54 AM PDT
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
2
posted on
04/10/2006 11:08:35 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: jmc1969
Boom.
Boom Boom Boom.
BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM BOOM
3
posted on
04/10/2006 11:10:23 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: jmc1969
The only good news would be the existing government irradiated themselves while witnessing their first test.
4
posted on
04/10/2006 11:11:32 AM PDT
by
edpc
To: mewzilla
Seems like the guy won't be happy until our planes are dropping explosives on them.
5
posted on
04/10/2006 11:12:13 AM PDT
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: jmc1969
The United Nations Security Council adopted a “Presidential Statement” unanimously on March 29 giving Iran 30 days to suspend all of its uranium enrichment activities......or else we'll give you another 30 days to comply!
6
posted on
04/10/2006 11:12:14 AM PDT
by
airborne
(Satan's greatest trick was convincing people he doesn't exist.)
To: jmc1969
If they test a nuke then we have the right to destroy them.
Especially after all that they said about never wanting nuclear weapons.
Then suddenly they have one?
That's a threat crying out for preemptive war if I ever saw one.
7
posted on
04/10/2006 11:12:34 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: jmc1969
8
posted on
04/10/2006 11:13:38 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why do you think we sold those 500 pound bunker buster bombs to Israel last year?
9
posted on
04/10/2006 11:13:44 AM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(I grew up in a slum, when I got to college it had become a "ghetto".)
To: trebb
I'm wondering if they're going to say they've already got them in an effort to stave off an attack.
Boy, I'd've loved to be a fly on the wall when they read Hersh's article. Sounds like they're as freaked as the MSM is :)
10
posted on
04/10/2006 11:14:03 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: jmc1969
That picture just gives me the unmitigated CREEPS. It really does.
11
posted on
04/10/2006 11:14:49 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(No mosques were entered or damaged during this post.)
To: mewzilla
"I'm wondering if they're going to say they've already got them in an effort to stave off an attack."
You can't just say it. You have to blow one off.
12
posted on
04/10/2006 11:15:19 AM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Allegra
13
posted on
04/10/2006 11:16:15 AM PDT
by
txhurl
To: jmc1969
giving Iran 30 days to suspend all of its uranium enrichment activities and resume its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Or what?
14
posted on
04/10/2006 11:17:00 AM PDT
by
scooter2
To: Berlin_Freeper
Depends to whom you say it.
15
posted on
04/10/2006 11:17:32 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Berlin_Freeper
You can't just say it. You have to blow one off. I have some concerns as to which direction they might want to do that.
But it won't do any good to lose any sleep over it.
16
posted on
04/10/2006 11:17:55 AM PDT
by
Allegra
(No mosques were entered or damaged during this post.)
To: jmc1969
They were NOT lying about having not built a weapon.
Pakistan built it, and sold it fair and square. Iran just needs a maintenance program. Silly Europeans. France is going to freak out when they figure out the yield from this test.
To: airborne
"...or else we'll give you another 30 days to comply! "
Worse.. A strongly worded letter!
To: jmc1969
More good news from the Iranian Taliban, can't wait. In light of their daily advancements in weaponry, this should also give us a good laugh.
19
posted on
04/10/2006 11:21:49 AM PDT
by
Realism
(Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
To: jmc1969
Well the whole 'timetable' the CIA was relying on was so flawed IMO.
They basically assumed it would take the sum of all time needed to produce a weapon in a very linear fashion. They did not account for various methods of parallel development, nor did they account for 'leapfrogging' of certain hurdles Iran accomplished by exploiting the A.Q.Khan nuke ring in Pakistan.
Even the 'short' estimates say 2 years, but the Iranian 'insurgents' claim it is much, much closer. There was story in Feb about the alleged Iranian timetable (I thought it said March/April)
Who knows... the 'news' might be another fake agreement with Russia to do something that is just a ruse anyway... time will tell.
When is this visit to whatever festival?
20
posted on
04/10/2006 11:22:22 AM PDT
by
FreedomNeocon
(I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson