Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors: Too few repeat drunken drivers get prison time(MN liberal weenie judges)
Grand Forks Herald ^ | 4-10-06 | ap

Posted on 04/10/2006 1:12:30 PM PDT by Rakkasan1

ST. PAUL - Despite a tough law designed to get chronic drunken drivers off the roads, more than 40 percent of felony DWI offenders avoid prison time and instead get sent to county jails for a year or less, according to court records.

Prosecutors say judges aren't handing down tough enough sentences, as they had hoped when the law took effect in 2002. In 2004, 43 percent of 222 DWI felons got a year or less in jail, according to statewide court data.

From the start of the law through mid-2005, 41 percent got less than three years in prison, the Minnesota Department of Corrections said.

"The judges unilaterally are engaged in a pattern of undermining the public's will as to how dangerous this crime is," Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner said. "I don't understand why, approximately half the time, the judges are giving these felons yet another break."

"That's not what we intended," said Minneapolis police Capt. Rich Stanek

(Excerpt) Read more at grandforks.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: drivers; drunk; drunken; dui; inebriates; judges; minnesota; mn; parasitic; prison; prosecutors
nope, no liberal judges here...
1 posted on 04/10/2006 1:12:38 PM PDT by Rakkasan1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
Liberal=weenie

It is redundant to use in the same sentence.

2 posted on 04/10/2006 1:17:21 PM PDT by lormand (...the wrong person came out of the water that fateful night in Chappaquiddick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1
If I may add a cynical observation:
I don't believe that the current laws are on the books for the safety of Minnesotans. Rather, they are worded and enforced in such a way so as to promote income generation.

I am not saying that this isn't a serious issue (it most certainly is). My point is rather, that if this is such a danger, there should be a zero strike rule; get caught, and it is felonious.

The fact that it is not, and we constantly hear about recidivism with respect to DUI/DWI cases. Leads one to believe that 'the system' doesn't WANT to have these people behind bars.

Just my 1/50th of a dollar...

3 posted on 04/10/2006 1:20:41 PM PDT by akorahil (Thank You and God bless all Veterans. Truly, the real heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: akorahil

if we had 0 strikes we'd have no non-felon legislators.


4 posted on 04/10/2006 1:26:55 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (they love you in Mexico until you pay in pesos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

Our legal system has been ruined by yahoos stirring up panic and passing mandatory sentencing laws such as this.

Sentences should be passed down by judges / juries, not politicians. When these hack prosecutors and the zealots at MADD complain, that's a good thing.


5 posted on 04/10/2006 1:33:41 PM PDT by IRememberElian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

You say that as if it wer a bad thing... ;)


6 posted on 04/10/2006 1:36:02 PM PDT by akorahil (Thank You and God bless all Veterans. Truly, the real heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IRememberElian
The statute defines felony DWI as the fourth drunken driving offense in a 10-year period.

I think after the fourth time most would agree a little prison time is appropriate.

7 posted on 04/10/2006 1:39:22 PM PDT by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IRememberElian

it not series till a judge's kid is killed by a drunk. then it's series.
it not series till the sex offender live in the judge's neighborhood. then it's real series.


8 posted on 04/10/2006 1:42:12 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (they love you in Mexico until you pay in pesos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

Nah, a little prison/jail time is appropriate on a second conviction. A fourth conviction deserves some fairly serious jail time.


9 posted on 04/10/2006 1:45:02 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65
I think after the fourth time most would agree a little prison time is appropriate.

I think so too. But, I don't know anything about any individual case. That's why we have judges and juries. Laws like this are mob justice and the reason more Americans are in prison than China and Russia combined.

10 posted on 04/10/2006 1:50:51 PM PDT by IRememberElian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

When a person is caugh drunk driving, impound the car and confiscate it. Afdter making payments on a debt and no car they will wake up soon enough.


11 posted on 04/10/2006 2:00:52 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rakkasan1

I post this every so often when the message seems relevant, sort of as a memorial to Mom, as well as to let people know what the justice system is really like.

December 5th, 2001, my mother, Shirley Norkunas, was killed in a car wreck. She was on her way to a Dr.'s appointment. The roads and weather were clear, it was about 9 in the morning, the place was just south of Superior, WI on State Hwy 35. She was driving north toward Superior.

A fellow named Thomas Frankot was heading south that morning, driving on a suspended license. He apparently fell asleep, crossed into my mother's lane, she was killed instantly in the resulting crash.

Thomas Frankot lived. He is essentially judgement proof, with very few assets.

He, after much wrangling, finally pled guilty in September 2002 to driving after suspension and driving left of center.

Previous relevant citations (there are half a dozen or so others). You can find them at the following website-

http://wcca.wicourts.gov/index.xsl

DWI
DWI/OAS (Operation After Suspension)
OAS
No Valid License
OAR (Operation after Revocation)
OAR

That was six offenses BEFORE he killed Mom, so you know he was really in trouble this time.

Was he ever.

He was fined $363, license suspended for six months, and given sixty days to pay.

That's not even the funny part.

He has not paid the fine for driving with a suspended license, even though over four years, much less the sixty days have lapsed.

I asked the clerk of courts what happens when the fines aren't paid.

They suspend his license.

Now, that's justice for ya.


12 posted on 04/10/2006 2:01:36 PM PDT by biggerten (Love you, Mom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biggerten

Sorry for your loss. While I am not an anti-DUI fanatic (a subject for another day), this guy should be doing hard time.


13 posted on 04/10/2006 3:17:37 PM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson