Weren't he and the President taking the Generals' lead on how many troops would be committed? I seem to remember the call srom many in the media for more troops a couple of years ago, and the Generals on the ground in Iraq said that they didn't NEED any more troops. So what's the deal here?
Is this just some personal thing with these Generals?
Get with the lib program. Don't you know that the SecDef is supposed to disregard the word of the men on the ground and their officers and instead only heed the advice of sensitive retired liberal or LaRouchie armchair generals?