Posted on 04/18/2006 9:37:29 AM PDT by robowombat
National Archives Vowed Silence
Associated Press | April 18, 2006
WASHINGTON - The National Archives promised to avoid drawing "unnecessary public attention" to its efforts to remove declassified CIA documents from public view after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, according to a once-secret agreement with the spy agency.
The agreement was made public Monday in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by The Associated Press. It provided new details on the efforts of the nation's chief historical repository to hide the fact that U.S. intelligence was secretly trying to reclassify approximately 55,500 pages of previously public documents.
Documents released last week to AP showed the Archives had agreed to refuse to disclose that the Air Force, the CIA and another intelligence agency had made the original request to remove the documents. The CIA agreement released Monday was not included in the documents made public last week.
"It is in the interests of both the CIA and the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to avoid the kind of public notice complaints that may arise from removing from the open shelves for extended periods of time records that had been publicly available." In addition, "NARA will not attribute to CIA any part of the review or the withholding of documents from this exposed collection," the agreement said.
The agreement with the CIA was dated October 2001 and set the mold for a second similarly worded secret agreement with the Air Force just months later. The disclosure of the secret dealings between the archives and the spy agencies has prompted a public outcry, including from historians concerned that pieces of history were being secretly reclassified with no accountability.
Archivist Allen Weinstein said he didn't learn until last Thursday that a second classified agreement had been signed by the archives, and he requested its immediate release. "There can never be a classified aspect to our mission," Weinstein said, promising that future agreements won't be kept secret.
Weinstein met Monday with several concerned groups to try to smooth relations. Attendees said the meeting was a good first step toward re-establishing the archives' credibility with the research community.
"The archivist spoke with chagrin, forthright with acknowledgment the secrecy of the activity was inappropriate. He didn't promise that records will not be removed, but if they are, NARA will provide public notice whenever it occurs and will also disclose how many records are affected," said Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists' government secrecy project.
Thomas Blanton, executive director for the private research group the National Security Archive, said Weinstein told the meeting he was surprised the CIA agreement didn't turn up until last week and wasn't released with the earlier documents.
"Archivist Weinstein was flabbergasted at the discovery of the second secret agreement. Weinstein has had the right reaction, his direct response when he found out (about the reclassification) was to place a moratorium on the program and institute an audit," Blanton said.
Weinstein announced a moratorium on the reclassification last month and an audit report is expected next week from his information security oversight office.
Blanton said the CIA agreement gave fodder to both sides in the debate over whether public historical documents should be removed. The Archives might view an agreement as a way to bring order to document withdrawals requested by the CIA starting as early as 1999, while others might see the National Archives "aiding and abetting a covert operation to white out history and mislead researchers."
Gosh. And to think we could have just sent Sandy Berger in to steal documents.
How about the article mentioning even slightly the reason for reclassifying these documents? Is it a cover up, or is it stuff terrorists might find useful?
So the Clinton Administration leaked information vital to national security?
Oh wait, they "declassified" the documents. That maybe shouldn't have been declassified yet because we still faced some of threats from the terrorist organizations.
re: Sandy Burglar
My thought exactly...... but what is so galling is that the pompous leftist blowhards who are now all in a snit over trying to keep sensitive documents away from our enemies don't care at all that Sandy Burglar committed felonious acts to make sure the AMERICAN PUBLIC could never know whatever embarrassing details cropped up in those stolen-and-destroyed draft manuscripts of the 2000 Millenium Bombing report.
The leftist "National Security Archive" doesn't care that Sandy Burglar kept all of us from knowing the facts in that case, but they will go to the mat trying to force all possible CIA documents to be released to our enemies.
What scumbags........
I'm sick and tired of politics right now. All of them on both sides. Most the leftist's side, of course, but our snivelling Republicans aren't making me terribly happy right now either with their non-defense of the Bush tax cuts or the war in Iraq. No one is trying to defend the president against the viscious lies from the leftists.
So I'm paying attention to a court case instead. LOL
Interesting tid-bit that the Bush administration needs to hide things again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.