Interesting way of going after a tax exempt status...
To: sirchtruth; nutmeg
un-freakin'-believable...CT PING!
2 posted on
04/24/2006 5:40:57 AM PDT by
Andonius_99
(They [liberals] aren't humans, but rather a species of hairless retarded ape.)
To: sirchtruth
Perry said the church created the situation, by failing to contest the tax bill it received last July.
"It seems so absurd," church moderator George Peteros said, that a church building assessed at $1.5 million could go to auction to recoup less than $5,000 in taxes.
The city maintains that any space not exclusively used for religious purposes, even if it generates no income, is taxable according to state law.
The state law is wrong, however it may be written. Every church does community services and these are included in the mission of the church. Especially in New England, churches have always been used for education and community service.
The law needs clarification (if needed), and this civil overlord needs firing.
3 posted on
04/24/2006 5:53:42 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120))
To: sirchtruth
I don't know if the tax assessment itself is reasonable or not. A tax exempt organization leasing property to another organization might reasonable make that property taxable.
However, it sounds like the church simply ignored the bill rather than contesting it. I imagine it happened out of confusion rather than as a protest against the assessment.
The church needed to fight the assessment or pay it. They can't just ignore it.
This mess makes for sensational headlines, especially since it New London, however this really seems more of a way for the city to force the church to address this issue.
The church isn't going to get sold to pay this tiny sum unless they continue to ignore their responsibility to address the issue. It doesn't sound like that's the case.
However, they may have to pay that tax assessment and the accompanying fines and fees immediately since they neglected to address this, and then fight the issue of the future status in court.
To: sirchtruth
they take people's homes, why wouldn't they take away churches?
5 posted on
04/24/2006 6:11:08 AM PDT by
absolootezer0
("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
To: sirchtruth
New London: Becasue Kelo was just not enough.
7 posted on
04/24/2006 6:16:52 AM PDT by
correctthought
(Hippies, want to change the world, but all they ever do is smoke pot and smell bad)
To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
Connecticut ping! (Thanks, Andonius_99)
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
10 posted on
04/24/2006 4:08:24 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson