Posted on 04/26/2006 10:43:28 PM PDT by SandRat
BAGHDAD, April 26, 2006 – While success in Iraq's march to freedom would mean good things for most of its neighbors, Iran could only view that as a failure, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said here today. Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice are here to meet with U.S. and Iraqi officials.
"A successful Iraq that is at peace with its neighbors and that has a government that's representative of the various elements within the country would represent an enormous success for this region," Rumsfeld said. "It would add to prosperity for the region. It would be something that all of the neighbors would benefit from, except Iran.
"Iran's view of the world is quite different," he continued, "and (a successful democracy in Iraq) would represent a failure from the standpoint of Iran."
Rumsfeld said people who are concerned by the Iranian government's provocative statements and its quest for nuclear weapons would recognize that a successful Iraq is "fundamentally inconsistent with the interests of Iran."
The secretary declined to speculate as to whether any need to contain Iran might require long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq. He noted that the U.N. resolution under which coalition forces now operate in Iraq is scheduled to expire at the end of the year.
"What we would want to do would be to engage in discussions with the new (Iraqi) government about that resolution and arrangements between our two countries with respect to our military-to-military relationship," Rumsfeld said. "It also will require us to begin the process in the Department of State and the Department of Defense to look forward in terms of the budget cycle to see what our arrangements would be in Iraq."
Rumsfeld said U.S. troop strength in Iraq would continue to be based on conditions on the ground and discussions with the Iraqi government.
More from SECDEF on Iraq, Iran, and the Southwest Asia Area
We're in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran is surrounded.
Well, I might say "sandwiched" instead of surrounded. Pretty close to the same and I share your thoughts. For a look-see: http://www.infoplease.com/atlas/middleeast.html.
If you've ever played Risk, the good guys now have pretty good positioning as opposed to the pre-Bush, Clinton-Human-Stain era.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.