Posted on 05/14/2006 2:33:19 PM PDT by FARS
Part of me died when I saw this cruel killing, HALA JABER
EVEN by the stupefying standards of Iraqs unspeakable violence, the murder of Atwar Bahjat, one of the countrys top television journalists, was an act of exceptional cruelty. Nobody but her killers knew just how much she had suffered until a film showing her death on February 22 at the hands of two musclebound men in military uniforms emerged last week. Her familys worst fears of what might have happened have been far exceeded by the reality.
Bahjat was abducted after making three live broadcasts from the edge of her native city of Samarra on the day its golden-domed Shiite mosque was blown up, allegedly by Sunni terrorists.
Roadblocks prevented her from entering the city and her anxiety was obvious to everyone who saw her final report. Night was falling and tensions were high.
Two men drove up in a pick-up truck, asking for her. She appealed to a small crowd that had gathered around her crew but nobody was willing to help her. It was reported at the time that she had been shot dead with her cameraman and sound man.
We now know that it was not that swift for Bahjat. First she was stripped to the waist, a humiliation for any woman but particularly so for a pious Muslim who concealed her hair, arms and legs from men other than her father and brother.
Then her arms were bound behind her back. A golden locket in the shape of Iraq that became her glittering trademark in front of the television cameras must have been removed at some point it is nowhere to be seen in the grainy film, which was made by someone who pointed a mobile phone at her as she lay on a patch of earth in mortal terror.
By the time filming begins, the condemned woman has been blindfolded with a white bandage.
It is stained with blood that trickles from a wound on the left side of her head. She is moaning, although whether from the pain of what has already been done to her or from the fear of what is about to be inflicted is unclear.
Just as Bahjat bore witness to countless atrocities that she covered for her television station, Al-Arabiya, during Iraqs descent into sectarian conflict, so the recording of her execution embodies the depths of the countrys depravity after three years of war.
A large man dressed in military fatigues, boots and cap approaches from behind and covers her mouth with his left hand. In his right hand, he clutches a large knife with a black handle and an 8in blade. He proceeds to cut her throat from the middle, slicing from side to side.
Her cries Ah, ah, ah can be heard above the Allahu akbar (God is greatest) intoned by the holder of the mobile phone.
Even then, there is no quick release for Bahjat. Her executioner suddenly stands up, his job only half done. A second man in a dark T-shirt and camouflage trousers places his right khaki boot on her abdomen and pushes down hard eight times, forcing a rush of blood from her wounds as she moves her head from right to left.
Only now does the executioner return to finish the task. He hacks off her head and drops it to the ground, then picks it up again and perches it on her bare chest so that it faces the film-maker in a grotesque parody of one of her pieces to camera.
The voice of one of the Arab worlds most highly regarded and outspoken journalists has been silenced. She was 30.
As a friend of Bahjat who had worked with her on a variety of tough assignments, I found it hard enough to bear the news of her murder. When I saw it replayed, it was as if part of me had died with her. How much more gruelling it must have been for a close family friend who watched the film this weekend and cried when he heard her voice.
The friend, who cannot be identified, knew nothing of her beheading but had been guarding other horrifying details of Bahjats ordeal. She had nine drill holes in her right arm and 10 in her left, he said. The drill had also been applied to her legs, her navel and her right eye. One can only hope that these mutilations were made after her death.
There is a wider significance to the appalling footage and the accompanying details. The film appears to show for the first time an Iraqi death squad in action.
The death squads have proliferated in recent months, spreading terror on both sides of the sectarian divide. The clothes worn by Bahjats killers are bound to be scrutinised for clues to their identity.
Bahjat, with her professionalism and impartiality as a half-Shiite, half-Sunni, would have been the first to warn against any hasty conclusions, however. The uniforms seem to be those of the Iraqi National Guard but that does not mean she was murdered by guardsmen. The fatigues could have been stolen for disguise.
A source linked to the Sunni insurgency who supplied the film to The Sunday Times in London claimed it had come from a mobile phone found on the body of a Shiite Badr Brigade member killed during fighting in Baghdad.
But there is no evidence the Iranian-backed Badr militia was responsible. Indeed, there are conflicting indications. The drill is said to be a popular tool of torture with the Badr Brigade. But beheading is a hallmark of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, led by the Sunni Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
According to a report that was circulating after Bahjats murder, she had enraged the Shiite militias during her coverage of the bombing of the Samarra shrine by filming the interior minister, Bayan Jabr, ordering police to release two Iranians they had arrested.
There is no confirmation of this and the Badr Brigade, with which she maintained good relations, protected her family after her funeral came under attack in Baghdad from a bomber and then from a gunman. Three people died that day.
Bahjats reporting of terrorist attacks and denunciations of violence to a wide audience across the Middle East made her plenty of enemies among both Shiite and Sunni gunmen. Death threats from Sunnis drove her away to Qatar for a spell but she believed her place was in Iraq and she returned to frontline reporting despite the risks.
We may never know who killed Bahjat or why. But the manner of her death testifies to the breakdown of law, order and justice that she so bravely highlighted and illustrates the importance of a cause she espoused with passion.
Bahjat advocated the unity of Iraq and saw her golden locket as a symbol of her belief. She put it with her customary on-air eloquence on the last day of her life: Whether you are a Sunni, a Shiite or a Kurd, there is no difference between Iraqis united in fear for this nation.
Ping, ping, ping
Then I stand corrected in the identity of the person slaughtered but not in the comments about the event.
Still open to debate I think. See:
[Greyhawk]
It's been one week since the London Times published the story of the murder of Atwar Bahjat. Within hours some serious questions were raised about the accuracy of the report, questions to which the Times has offered no response. The only additional information published thus far on their web site is a letter from a reader expressing outrage over the brutal murder. It would seem the Times is standing by their original story.
I've seen no conclusive evidence either way. It's possible the Times does have a video of the murder that no one else has seen, and that it is very similar to another killing in another video. It's also possible the Times was the victim of a cruel hoax, and that the reporter who knew Atwar Bahjat was duped by the power of suggestion into believing the man killed in a low-quality video was her.
http://www.mudvillegazette.com/archives/004617.html
All that, just to plant two sound bites?
"....so the recording of her execution embodies the depths of the countrys depravity after three years of war."
"But the manner of her death testifies to the breakdown of law, order and justice that she so bravely......"
What crap.
Hmm. Interesting as I haven't seen either video (nor would I) I certainly can't say either way. Thanks for the link.
I do think it is unfortunate that western media seems obsessed with hyping these monsters and doing much of their propaganda for them.
"The video was a low quality copy of the beheading of an Italian"
I believe it was a male Nepali.
I heard this ol' boy on the radio; said the difference between WW II and this War, is that WW II was a land grab, what these extremists and jihadists want to do is to kill us. What is the solution?? It looks like the most drastic measures.
This is what the Party of Treason and the Treason Media refuse to tell the truth about in their insane drive to thwart and demonize the President and the War. Then there are the loons HERE at FR trying to cut his legs off to "teach the GOP a lesson". Such actions only aid these demonic forces whose defeat is the number one priority of the United States. And these people are NOT the Base of the GOP no matter how many times they proclaim it.
Anything (no matter what pieties it proclaims) which inteferes with the combat of this unspeakable evil by weakening the President has NOTHING to do with Conservativism. It serves only those forces desperate to bring down the Good in this nation.
It's for sure that America's emasculated, feminized and homosexualized moral-relitivist uneducated -- which number includes pretty much our every post-1950s college and university graduate -- will continue to project its woosy-eunoch feminazism on our enemies, have not the slightest idea that we are engaged with pure evil in a battle for the survival of our nation and for the survival of the very Judeo-Christian/Western/Human Civilization.
Of which The United States of America, a tiny handful of somewhat half-hearted allies and Israel and Australia are the sole remaining defenders.
I just read the article!
Bravo!
Don't get your hopes up. About 60% of the people in this once great country live in a fake world full of good intentions and outright foolishnes. Our media has no problems showing a dog lunging at a detainee in Abu Grahib, but they won't show the brutal slaughter of men and women at the hands of these sub humans.
This country is full of pansies who aren't willing to fight the enemy. Thank God for the brave soldiers we do have! They are the only thing keeping the knives off your family's neck. Next time you see one....thank them.
VERY WELL SAID.
You are 100 percent correct!
Maybe if it were Natalie Holloway's head the Treason Media would have covered it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.