[Hodar]

Thanks Jim;

IMHO, if ANY candidate would simply stand and say "I want our immigration laws enforced, I want our border's locked down, and I want illegals deported"; I'd vote for them without regad to thier party affiliation.

We have Republicans who have no idea what the party stands for, each has used his position to better himself at the expense of those who put him in office.

It's time to haul out the trash.

[Luke21]

"I'd vote for them without regad to thier party affiliation."

You sound like you're from Boston. Nice accent.

[Radix]

"I'd vote for them without regad to thier party affiliation."

I can't go along with that sentiment. The Democrats are so completely vile that I could never support one who would even be associated with them.

I'm sure that there are other Zell Miller types out there, but no vote from me ever for anyone with that "D" trailing their name.

[ottersnot]

It's a tough call.
Part of me says don't vote CINO no matter what. If they can't even secure the border then what good are they.

The other part sees the Judges we just put on the court
and says NICE. It also says that the DNC would have screwed the pooch on the war on terror and never had the stones to go into Iraq.

I didn't vote for Virginia Senator John Warner the last time he ran, and I never will vote for that bastage.
I'm not sure I'll have the same conviction if it comes down to Giuliani or McCain vs Hitlery though.

[Cementjungle]

I'd vote for them without regad to thier party affiliation.

You should at least try to determine if they mean it or not. Someone like Hillary would say anything to any given audience, as would many Dems.

[CDHart]

"better himself at the expense of those who put him in office. "

For the most part, that's why they want to get elected. They have no desire to help the country or make the world a better place. It's all "gimmee, gimmee, gimmee."

Carolyn