Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Controlling border a prerequisite to comprehensive immigration reform (Sen. Wayne Allard)
Rockey Mountain News ^ | May 20, 2006 | Sen. Wayne Allard

Posted on 05/20/2006 3:30:48 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit

"Perhaps no issue before the Senate in recent history has elicited more emotion from both sides of the debate than the issue of illegal immigration. My job as a U.S. senator is to see through the cloud of emotional rhetoric blurring the debate and act in the best interests of the United States and the citizens of Colorado.

The principle upon which I rely to guide me through this debate is simple: the rule of law.

While America is a nation of immigrants, it is also a nation of laws. The rule of law is the foundation of our society upon which all else is built, and without which all else would crumble. Immigration laws are no exception.

(Excerpt) Read more at rockymountainnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; aliens; allard; borders; bordersecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
The bold is my emphasis.
1 posted on 05/20/2006 3:30:49 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
The principle upon which I rely to guide me through this debate is simple: the rule of law.

How freakin' refreshing is that.

Mr President, are you LISTENING?

2 posted on 05/20/2006 3:32:44 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustPiper; Arizona Carolyn; nicmarlo; Kimberly GG; La Enchiladita; TigersEye; TheLion; ...

Ping!


3 posted on 05/20/2006 3:32:48 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
Of the 12 million illegal immigrants estimated to be here, approximately 40 percent have arrived here since 9/11.

No one to blame but Bush for that sad fact. Post 9/11 our vaunted WOT as allowed approximately 5 million illegals "living in the shadows" to sneak into our country. What a joke.

4 posted on 05/20/2006 3:34:47 PM PDT by Maynerd (Defeat Bush's "Leave no Mexican Behind" immigration "reform")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

I'm still not hearing anything about our International Airports. The focus is mis-spent on Mexicans.


5 posted on 05/20/2006 3:38:01 PM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

Okay, I might get blasted here...but I find it so ironic when I read/hear a Colorado politician playing hardball on immigration...when I heard that in Denver, the libraries have the Mexican flag hanging outside an all spanish library...at least that is what I heard!!!

I used to live in Boulder...so I get mad, when I hear Tancrado and others taking on the President...when their own state is about as liberal..and pro-immigrant as they come.


6 posted on 05/20/2006 3:42:35 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Colorado is evenly split three ways between Republican, Democrat, and Independent. Denver, Boulder, Pueblo, Aspen, Telluride are the liberal hot spots. The Denver suburbs are Republican or lean Independent. Colorado Springs is Republican.

Tancredo represents Douglas and Jefferson County, and wins by large margins.

At least one of our Senators (Allard) gets it! The other Senator (Salazar)is a Kennedy butt-boy.


7 posted on 05/20/2006 3:52:30 PM PDT by digerati
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: digerati

Salazar is not only bad...but he misrepresented himself when he campaigned...(not that they all don't to a certain extent)...

He isn't the only one...Mel Martinez, in Florida, who Bush actually campaigned for..has been a disappointment as well.


8 posted on 05/20/2006 3:56:14 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Solamente

Oh, and don't let my nick deceive. I'm of NW European stock, purely, albeit humbly peasant DNA, with neanderthal red hair-ness.


9 posted on 05/20/2006 3:59:57 PM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
Hannity made an excellent point: if a proposal is good, it should be allowed to stand on its own. The pro-invader politicians want to legallize the criminals while stopping the entry of more illegals. Their real interest is in the former--so much so that if they do the former the latter won't get done. At the same time, however, they know that the public wants the latter. The only way to ensure the latter actually gets done is to insist that it be done first.
10 posted on 05/20/2006 4:04:59 PM PDT by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

How did Sen. Wayne Allard vote on the immigration law? Its how you vote that counts.


11 posted on 05/20/2006 4:09:58 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

They haven't taken a vote on the whole bill yet, they are still debating and putting in amendments.


12 posted on 05/20/2006 4:12:37 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

I'm really sick of this nation of immigrants BS. The US is a nation of CITIZENS regardless of ethnic background. This is what makes us different from every other country. Once an immigrant becomes a citizen then he or she becomes and American in all ways. An immigrant who is not a citizen can't be expected to have loyalty to the country, the Constitution and our way of life.


13 posted on 05/20/2006 4:15:03 PM PDT by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

I checked his voting record on the amendments that have been put forward already....and he voted the exact same way that Sessions, Kyl, and Cornyn did (they are the ones that are fighting like heck to defeat this bill)...except for one time...and it was kind of a middle of the road type vote...not bad, IMHO>


14 posted on 05/20/2006 4:21:07 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit
A funny thing happens when you ask a direct question 'Do you support putting a wall on the border?' Either the person says 'YES' or they saying something else - but they never just say 'NO'. The 'no' answers are always long and convoluted and involve the word 'comprehensive' somewhere. Ask the question to anybody about this issue and you'll see this same thing occur. Everybody should look for this when watching politicians and talking heads regarding this issue.

Either you are for securing the border or you are not. If you ARE, you have no problem building a wall. If you aren't, you will find every excuse under the sun to avoid making border enforcement THE issue. Allard is a real life actual conservative. He wants the border closed FIRST and then the 'comprehensive' part figured out.

15 posted on 05/20/2006 4:24:53 PM PDT by bpjam (Opinion Polls Don't Protect Our Borders.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

Yep, Not completely positive but certainly heading in the right direction.. I do like what he said though, which is basically if in doubt stick to the laws.. it cuts though all that touchy feely bs that libs and rats thrive on. ;)


16 posted on 05/20/2006 4:28:32 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

Touchy feely is right...I was watching as much of the Senate as I could last week...and the speeches talking about the poor illegals were sickening...especially by Durbin and Harry Reid...

I am SURE if they played those speeches on prime time national networks...not only would the House measure get pushed by all Americans...but I have no doubt that Harry and Durbin would lose their seats...


17 posted on 05/20/2006 4:47:29 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth

"I have no doubt that Harry and Durbin would lose their seats..."

Is that a promise? ;^)


18 posted on 05/20/2006 4:56:43 PM PDT by SeaBiscuit (God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeaBiscuit

I don't think I would have to worry about breaking a promise..since it would be a cold day in hell before the networks would show what really goes on in Congress...

AND, there is a lot going on that we never see on C-span, also...THAT is what gets us in bigger trouble..the behind the doors deals.


19 posted on 05/20/2006 5:01:43 PM PDT by Txsleuth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: digerati
At least one of our Senators (Allard) gets it! The other Senator (Salazar)is a Kennedy butt-boy.

Apparently the voters (similar to the voters in most states) don't get it. They pull the lever for an Allard-type which is great and then they turn around and pull the lever for a lefty such as Salazar.

No wonder this country is screwed up.

20 posted on 05/20/2006 5:10:26 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson