Posted on 05/22/2006 1:48:50 PM PDT by JSedreporter
An actual terrorist attack upon its students did not elicit the same reaction from administrators at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill that other hate crimes of varying degrees of severity did.
Despite the nature of the attack, Taheri-azars own statements to police, and the items found in his apartment, many are objecting to efforts to label this an act of terrorism, UNC-Chapel Hill junior Kris Wampler wrote in The Carolina Review. And UNC is doggedly refusing to do so. The fact is, this is not the universitys call, Chancellor James Moeser said. The U. S. attorney will determine whether or not this is an act of terrorism.
If that is Moesers attitude, it might be a first. Rarely do state university authorities regard Bush Administration officials as experts.
What Taheri-azar did was run his car into a crowd of students in the schools pit, a popular converging point. Fortunately, none were killed as a result of the alums act.
Rather, the chancellor missed an opportunity to stand with the Carolina community and rebuke what happened on March 3, Wampler writes. This is in stark contrast to the chancellors reaction last year when Thomas Stockwell, a gay student, was attacked near campus.
Moeser attended an anti-hate rally last year to deliver remarks. This year he didnt even show up at a rally that expressed outrage at several students being run over by an Islamic extremist.
To its credit, the campus Muslim Student Association denounced the Taheri-Azar attack. Some chapters of the MSA have been so extreme that federal investigators have reviewed the groups finances.
As a freshman in 2002, my class was initially required to read a pro-Islamic text, Approaching the Quran, Wampler remembers. The book glossed over the violent aspects of Islamic culture and gave Carolinas first entering class since Sept. 11 a one-sided view of a complicated religion.
In February of this year, the Daily Tar Heel published a cartoon depicting the Prophet Muhammad, which campus Muslims deemed offensive. This prompted a letter to the editor from two high level administration officials, Margaret Jablonski and Archie Ervin, condemning the cartoon,
More true to form, the MSA condemned it as well. Other People of the Book do not have such juice at Chapel Hill.
More blatant is the fact that the DTH published a cartoon in late November that depicted Catholics as Nazis, Wampler reports. But there were no letters to the editor from Jablonski or Ervin concerning these matters.
Malcolm A. Kline is the executive director of Accuracy in Academia.
Dhimmitude in academia.
Couched in their superiority the educated upper class without commen sense can't see their own destruction.
FYI, Muslims are not People of the Book.
By the time (mid-Seventh Century AD) Mohammed dreamed up his evil, murderous cult he referred to as a religion, Judaism and Christianity were well established real religions.
The only connection between Muslims, Christians, Jews and "The Book" is that Muslims prey on and kill, among other "Infidels," Christians and Jews, who are the "People of the Book."
The UNC Chancellor is a fruitcake liberal who is afraid of his own shadow in not denouncing this blatant act of terrorism on his own campus. Seems the good folks of North Carolina deserve a lot better than they're getting from this numbnuts Chancellor, and he is probably the same P.O.S. that hired the Breck girlie-boy John Edwards to head up the UNC studies on poverty. Edwards couldn't get elected to dog catcher in North Carolina now, and this idiot hires him...go figure!
bump for publicity
Ain't that the truth....as always.
BTTT
Dang, I thought this thread was about something else.
This kind of crap doesn't happen at the Compound!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.