Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No nuclear objection: Costello (Australia Debates Nuclear Fuel)
The Australian ^ | May 23, 2006

Posted on 05/23/2006 1:23:45 AM PDT by CheyennePress

ACTING Prime Minister Peter Costello has backed the development of a nuclear power industry in Australia whenever it became commercially viable. Mr Costello's comments follow Prime Minister John Howard signalling he wants a full-scale nuclear debate when he returns from an overseas trip later this week.

"If it becomes commercial, we should have it. That is, there's no in-principle objection to nuclear energy," Mr Costello told Southern Cross Radio today.

"Nuclear energy is an efficient form of energy. Provided you deal properly with the waste, then it's safe.

"It has much less greenhouse emissions than coal.

"There's no in-principle objection to it – it's just a question of economics.

"At some point I would think that it would become commercial, that's some time off.

"If it becomes commercial, yeah sure, people should be allowed to build it."

Mr Costello also backed an increase in Australia's uranium export industry.

Australia had 40 per cent of the world's available uranium resources, a much larger percentage of the world's resources of uranium than we had of gas and coal, he said.

"This could be a fabulous export industry for Australia," he said.

"We only export it to countries that have nuclear safeguards.

"You'd be a mug if you had the opportunity to sell Australia's products and you didn't take it up.

"It'd be like leaving the iron ore in the ground or the gas in the ground.

"This has the potential to deliver a lot of income for Australia."


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: australia; costello; energy; howard; nuclear
Whoever knew Australia held 40% of the world's uranium? I'm surprised they haven't put it to use, yet.
1 posted on 05/23/2006 1:23:48 AM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress
There were reports recently that somebody had uncovered evidence that some Australian uranium wound up being used by the Manhattan Project - we've exported it for a while.

It hasn't been used much here (we do have one nuclear reactor, and a replacement for it is under construction) partly because we also have a lot of coal, and with the anti-nuclear paranoia of the past, it's been easier to have (rather dirty) coal power plants.

2 posted on 05/23/2006 1:41:40 AM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheyennePress

Australia is the #2 producer or UOx (Uranium Oxide), Canada is #1.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf23.htm

"Canada produces the largest share of uranium from mines (29% of world supply from mines), followed by Australia (21%)."

Canada 2006
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf49.htm

Australia 2005
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf64.htm


Plenty of DU ammo started out as ore from Canada & Australia.


3 posted on 05/23/2006 8:55:44 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson