Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Big step towards smaller, faster, more efficient, computers and more.

Enjoy.

1 posted on 05/27/2006 6:17:58 PM PDT by PeaceBeWithYou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PeaceBeWithYou

...good post. Many other changes will accompany the new computers, when they are on the market.


2 posted on 05/27/2006 6:21:02 PM PDT by familyop ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." --President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

i'm still waiting for holographic drives(storage)... remember that?


3 posted on 05/27/2006 6:28:15 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

2010 is when current memory technology is supposed to hit its limit. Logic and processing chips not likely until 2015.

The manufacturing tool sets are coming to market and while CNTs are known to have quality issues the direction forward looks good.


4 posted on 05/27/2006 6:30:35 PM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
What's a transistor? (just kidding)

Seriously, I've heard about many techtologies over the years: Germanium, gallium-arsenide. This particular one seems to imply a completely different manufacturing process.

One of the limitations of traditional N- and P- doped silicon is the atomic size difference between boron (+) and phosphorus (-). Even though CMOS stands for complimentary metal oxide semiconductor, the P-channel devices run at only about half the speed as their N- counterparts. This is why, in the early days before CMOS dominance, it was NMOS devices that were typically seen in early IC memory and microprocessor applications. Very few IC's employed PMOS, and all without exception that I can think of were linear, analog applications. I never quite understood why - cleaner signals maybe?

The key will be attaining a high yield rate with an inexpensive manufacturing process. The article hints at one of the upcoming challenges to this:

Current fabrication techniques produce a mix of nanotubes with different sizes and electronic properties, not all of which will work well in integrated circuits.

5 posted on 05/27/2006 6:43:07 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

I always knew that transistors were a flash in the pan and that tubes would make a comeback some day.


8 posted on 05/27/2006 6:53:30 PM PDT by Erasmus ("Peace on you!" -- Imam Ofo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Way too Cool.

I haven't even stressed the Pute I have and it's OLD

TT
10 posted on 05/27/2006 7:01:07 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
Man I haven't dealt with this stuff since computer school learning semi conductor theory and "hole flow"...Good Stuff

(O God ! I am a geek !:O ;)

11 posted on 05/27/2006 7:02:30 PM PDT by tophat9000 (If it was illegal French Canadians would La Raza back them? Racist back there race over country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou
"... much work remains to be done before commercial processors will be available."

An understatement to be sure.

Carbon nanotubes and bucky balls are interesting things, but as one nanotech researcher pointed out at a recent lecture, they have been around a long time.

It's basically soot! You can make your own nanotubes on Memorial Day when you get distracted and start incinerating those burgers on the grill. If you happen to have a Scanning Electron Microscope handy (someone I know has one in his garage), you can marvel at your creations. Maybe you'll get amazingly lucky and a few will land between the filaments of your wire grill brush & make carbon nanotube resistors!
14 posted on 05/27/2006 8:06:12 PM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PeaceBeWithYou

bump to read.


15 posted on 05/27/2006 8:06:46 PM PDT by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson