Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celebration honors plane that helped win World War II (Corsair)
Connecticut Post ^ | 05/30/2006 | MICHAEL P. MAYKO

Posted on 05/30/2006 9:51:11 AM PDT by holymoly

The Health Net Corsair Celebration Day was held at Sikorsky Memorial Airport in Stratford on Monday. Here, a vintage Corsair is given a fly-by as spectators watch, by chief pilot Jim Vocell. Vocell is from the American Air Power Museum in Farmingdale, NY. (Christian Abraham/Connecticut Post)
STRATFORD — Hugh Pickering looked over the dark blue aircraft with the bent wings and large propeller as it sat quietly outside a hangar at Sikorsky Memorial Airport.

On Monday, that plane was more than a relic. It was a time machine, propelling Pickering back more than 60 years to an island called Roy Namur somewhere in the South Pacific.

There, he sees Charles Lindbergh, showing him how to take that plane up with 4,000 pounds of bombs strapped to it.

He sees himself standing on the ground watching Nicholas Mainiero heroically land that plane after anti-aircraft fire took out Mainiero's

Jim Vocell, of the American Air Power Museum in Farmindale, N.Y., is seen in the top photo signaling to have the wheel chocks removed before his flight.
eye and ripped open his arm.

He sees himself flying that plane, maneuvering it on strafing runs as enemy ammunition dumps and troop carriers explode below.

"That plane was vital to us winning the war in the Pacific," said Pickering, now 83 and living in Westport.

That plane was the Corsair, designed by Vought-Sikorsky and later built by Chance-Vought and Goodyear Aircraft. Sixty-six years ago Monday, the first one climbed the skies and altered the war in the Pacific.

"It was fast," Pickering said. "It could dive faster than anything out there."

But to a pilot like himself the key was the three-quarter-inch steel running behind the pilot's head, shoulders and seat.

"No bullets could penetrate it," he said. "The Japanese Zero was light and highly maneuverable but it couldn't take a hit."

The U.S. Navy's Bureau of Aeronautics proposed building the Corsair to United Aircraft on Feb. 1, 1939, according to an article by Earl Swinhart. It included a 2,804-cubic-inch air-cooled radial engine that could deliver 1,850 horsepower, a three-blade, 13-foot-4-inch prop, and bent wings containing .50-caliber machine guns.

Nearly 13,000 of the planes were built before production stopped in 1953.

"This aircraft was unlike anything ever built at the time," said Annette LoSardo of Monroe.

LoSardo was one of America's Rosie the Riveters — the thousands of women who went to work in defense plants while men were shipped off to war.

It was on the assembly line that LoSardo — then a recent high school graduate who moved here from Pennsylvania to work — met her husband, Joseph, then her foreman.

"She won't admit it," said Joseph LoSardo, now almost 90. "But there was a water fountain near my desk. She couldn't take her eyes off of me every time she went for a drink of water."

The pair, now married 62 years, spends much of their time at the Connecticut Air and Space Center, where Joseph is working on rebuilding a Sikorsky S-52 helicopter.

When the pair start talking about the Corsair, Annette believes "nobody had anything that could match it."

So on Monday, pilots like Pickering, Mainiero and James Anderson, 86, of Hamden, and assemblers, like the LoSardos, gathered with more than 100 other Corsair enthusiasts at the Three Wing Flying Services hangar at Sikorsky Memorial Airport to remember and pay tribute to the Corsair — the state's official aircraft.

The program sponsored by Three Wing, HealthNet and the Connecticut Air Museum marked what state Sen. George "Doc" Gunther, R-Stratford, hopes will be an annual Corsair Celebration Day.

"That plane was something else," Gunther said. "It had a kill ratio of 10 to 1."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corsair; pacific
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
USMC Lieutenant Kenneth A. Walsh (VMF-124), the first Corsair ace, and the first F4U pilot to be awarded the Medal of Honor.

1stLt KENNETH A. WALSH, Medal of Honor, 1943

Marine Pilots in the Solomons

1 posted on 05/30/2006 9:51:15 AM PDT by holymoly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: holymoly

My absolute FAVORITE aircraft!!!!


2 posted on 05/30/2006 9:52:44 AM PDT by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

I like the Japanese WWII nick name for the Corsair

"Whistling Death"


3 posted on 05/30/2006 9:55:56 AM PDT by E.Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holymoly

Did Pappy Boyington also fly a Corsair?


4 posted on 05/30/2006 9:56:26 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

My favorite too...


5 posted on 05/30/2006 9:56:56 AM PDT by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Yep, that's the first thing I think of when I see the Corsair, "Baa Baa Black Sheep."


6 posted on 05/30/2006 9:57:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker
Mine too!!!

I'm an aviation mechanical designer. 'Bout two years ago, I finished working on the HondaJet...Honda's first foray into bizjet aviation. The absolute highlight of this project for me was working with Ed MacDonough, a 90 year old structural engineer. It was the highlight for me because he is also the engineer that designed the Corsair's wingroot system. Ninety years old and his mind is/was RAZOR sharp. It was quite a treat.

7 posted on 05/30/2006 9:58:40 AM PDT by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf; Iris7; alfa6; Valin; snippy_about_it

Round engine, two wheels ping


8 posted on 05/30/2006 9:58:51 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (The lifespan of a "temporary" tax has finally been established.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Nearly 13,000 of the planes were built before production stopped in 1953.

Thirteen-thousand! Incredible!

9 posted on 05/30/2006 10:07:01 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axeslinger; conservativehusker
Me Too!


10 posted on 05/30/2006 10:07:11 AM PDT by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: holymoly
Separated from his escort group when he encountered approximately fifty Japanese Zeros, he unhesitatingly attacked, striking with relentless fury in his lone battle against a powerful force. He destroyed four hostile fighters before cannon shellfire forced him to make a deadstick landing off Vella LaVella

Well deserved medal...God bless all such heroes.

11 posted on 05/30/2006 10:08:29 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Yep. VMF-214 may have started with F4F Wildcats (I'm not sure) but they made their name in the F4U Corsair.

The irony is that the Navy, who ordered the aircraft, got cold feet when they realized that the huge, long nose made it extremely difficult to land on an aircraft carrier (the deck couldn't be seen under the nose and the pilots were landing blind). So they passed it off to the Marines and land-based Navy squadrons, where it really shone, and the Navy carrier-based squadrons used the Grumman F6F Hellcat, which was a more forgiving (and no less lethal) aircraft.

British Royal Navy pilots were actually the first to put the Corsair into wide carrier-based use, when they figured out that a sweeping curved approach could solve the visibility problem. Only then did the USN start flying it off carriers.

The highlight of the 2002 Celebrate Freedom Festival (Columbia, SC) to me was watching Joe Tobul's awesomely restored Korean-era F4U-4 "Korean War Hero" go through its paces. Sadly, the plane suffered an engine failure the next day and crashed, killing Tobul; he possibly could have bailed out, but stayed with the plane to try and get it back to the airport. He didn't make it and crashed into a backyard about a mile away.

}:-)4


12 posted on 05/30/2006 10:11:13 AM PDT by Moose4 (Please don't call me "white trash." I prefer "Caucasian recyclable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker
My absolute FAVORITE aircraft!!!!

It's right up there with my favorites too.

I remember reading something form a Marine pilot who was switched from the F4F Wildcat to the Corsair. He said that the first time he cracked open the throttle on a takeoff run the tremendous surge of power from that big P&W Double Wasp radial pinned him back to the seat like nothing he had never experienced before. After that flight he had complete confidence that he could outrun, outclimb, and outfight any Jap fighter anywhere anytime, a confidence he had not felt in the semi-obsolescent Grumman.

They say that confidence in yourself and your aircraft is 90% of the game in fighter combat, and the Corsair apparently inspired lots of it. I hope somebody will keep a few of those old warbirds flying at least as long as there are people who remember them in their heyday.

13 posted on 05/30/2006 10:13:29 AM PDT by epow (Outside of a dog a book is man's best friend, inside a dog it's too dark to read a book, Groucho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

The long nose and it landing characteristics on carriers is why one of its nicknames is the Ensign Eliminator.


14 posted on 05/30/2006 10:15:17 AM PDT by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E.Allen

The Corsair couldn't maneuver with a Zero--nothing could. But it was 60+ mph faster, much tougher, and much better at high altitudes. If an F4U had an altitude advantage it could just dive down, slash into a formation of Zeroes, and then either zoom back up to altitude or dive away. If it was lower, it could just dive away and the Zeroes had no hope of catching it.

The wing design was simply to get enough clearance on the landing gear so that huge prop wouldn't hit the ground. But it was a fantastically maneuverable plane at high speed. Zeroes were amazingly nimble at low speed, but over about 300 mph their controls got so heavy they could hardly roll. That was when the Corsair was just getting started.

Everything I've read says that the F4U was a real bastard to handle at low speed, though--very twitchy because of the massive torque caused by the engine and prop. It was not a forgiving airplane to a rookie, especially on carrier operations.

}:-)4


15 posted on 05/30/2006 10:16:41 AM PDT by Moose4 (Please don't call me "white trash." I prefer "Caucasian recyclable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: epow

Notice he didn't say "out turn"? ;) Who needs to out-turn, when all you have to do when caught in a pickle is step on the gas and yer gone!


16 posted on 05/30/2006 10:18:49 AM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Yep. 1850 to 2400 horsepower (depending on version) swinging a 13-foot prop, that's a LOT of torque. I'm not sure if this is true, but there's stories that if a rookie cracked the throttle wide open too fast, and didn't know what to do, he could flip the plane over in a heartbeat.

You look at the technology and the weapons of WWII, and compare them to today, and have to wonder at the risks that were accepted as commonplace 65 years ago. A plane with the Corsair's difficult handling characteristics simply wouldn't be made today--there'd be outcries, Congressional hearings, lawsuits, media exposes on "Ensign Eliminators" and "deathtraps" like the Corsair and the B-26 Marauder. Gunners standing in unheated unpressurized B-17s at 25,000 feet, freezing their hands to their guns at 40 below zero? The media wouldn't stand for it.

But back then, people just shrugged, hitched up their pants, and accepted the risks. And they freed the world.

}:-)4


17 posted on 05/30/2006 10:22:52 AM PDT by Moose4 (Please don't call me "white trash." I prefer "Caucasian recyclable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: epow

There is a beautiful one still in flying condition at the Fargo Air Museum. Always loved the look of the Corsair, but was stunned by the size of it.

Also have a super Corsair on display there from time to time, but its still flying competition races.


18 posted on 05/30/2006 10:23:54 AM PDT by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Moose4

I don't doubt the story is true. About 10-15 years ago, a P-51 Mustang tried landing at a nearby airport. For whatever reason, the pilot decided to abort the landing and pushed the throttle all the way forward for a go-around. It started to roll, caught a wingtip, and crashed. The Corsair had a LOT more torque than the P-51.

Our aircraft in WWII may have been "twitchy", but none of them ((that I can think of) had flaws that a good pilot could not master. I am thinking of the British Typhoon and a few others. The tail would actually fall off of it in some situations because of poor design. It also became uncontrollable in a dive because of aerodynamic interference at the engine oil-cooler/wing-root intersection.


19 posted on 05/30/2006 10:34:26 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

Used heavily during the Korean war too.


20 posted on 05/30/2006 10:36:26 AM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson