You just make assertions over and over that have no detail at all. And each assertion is an exact parroting of the assertion of one or more former Clinton official who singled him out and jailed him after it was made clear how much interaction and money Clinton was getting from actual Chinese communists from China who were visiting the White House and fundraisers etc...
What "classified nuclear secrets" did he take from the lab?
By Paul Sperry
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON -- Former nuclear scientist Wen Ho Lee has broken his plea agreement by failing to help FBI agents recover classified computer tapes he stole from Los Alamos National Laboratory....
But despite intensive debriefing by the FBI, Lee has not adequately explained why he copied the files to the tapes and what he did with the tapes. The tapes remain missing. Authorities dont buy his innocent claim, first made on CBS' "60 Minutes," that he copied the information to back up his work, because numerous measures had been built into Los Alamos computing system to protect against file loss. Lab physicists, moreover, testified that there was no legitimate reason for one scientist to have made backups of the entire library of source codes, since they normally work on just one small piece at a time. Authorities also say Lees claim he tossed the missing tapes in a trash bin behind his office at Los Alamos didnt check out. And why toss those, yet keep the others? Under the terms of his plea deal, Lee agreed to disclose such information
"These files, which amounted to more than 806 megabytes, contained information that could'do vast damage to the national security.
""These codes and their associated data bases and the input file, combined with someone that knew how to use them, could, in my opinion, in the wrong hands, change the global strategic balance."
""They enable the possessor to design the only objects that could result in the military defeat of America's conventional forces ... They represent the gravest possible security risk to ... the supreme national interest."
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2000_rpt/specter.html http://www.nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory022603.asp http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=1138