Posted on 06/09/2006 8:46:47 PM PDT by Mia T
I think Ann shut hillary up for life. But hillary will use her minions for her mouthpiece - you know, the lib shield.
Hillary-the-person isn't running. The idea of hillary is, the idea of hillary as put out on a daily basis by all manner of proxy, from simple spinner to elaborate Hollywood production.1 QUESTION: When was the last time you observed "the smartest woman in the world"2 partake in our process of political discourse, or, as Charles Kuralt once put it, relish in "the raucous give and take of American democracy?" ANSWER: Never. Hillary-the-person answers to no one.3 ...The bottom line is this paradox: In order for hillary clinton to have any chance of winning elections, she must all but vanish from the public stage.5
If the problem has already taken root, she plants false news stories about it. (Missus clinton's sorry sock-puppet status falls into this category.) 6 It is only when her power, treasure or freedom appears in imminent danger does she deign7 to put the lie10 in our face herself.8 SEX, LIES AND SOCK PUPPETS:
|
"The fools in downstate couldn't tell you ONE thing she has accomplished in the senate. They'll probably say something like, "She does good work with children"".
hillary clinton with children - now that scares me! Really scares me!!!!!
"The senator spoke after delivering a speech on protecting children from exposure to sex- and violence-saturated media."
Can you believe this statement? After the years of sex objects hanging on the WH Christmas tree, now Hil is trying to save the kids from porn? LOL! Talk about hypocritical! This is what the Clintons are best known for, anyway. Speaking one thing to the crowds, doing another thing when it comes to voting, acting on something. No one should EVER believe that they are pro-family!
BTTT
We need lots of fanatics.
Just relax and take a deep breath.
Presidential character is everything. And by extension, at least, so is senatorial character....
Your point is well-taken, however, but I would tweak the wording a bit.
Personally, I would prefer 'focused' or 'tenacious.' ;)
It is unbelievable... but this is precisely the clinton mo.... And so we suffer bizarre, cognitively dissonant events like when this chronic abuser of women excoriated the entire world about the abuse of women... Hillary Clinton or when this very real criminal lectured federal regulators about video games that allow players to go on simulated crime sprees.. Clinton Urges Inquiry Into Hidden Sex in Grand Theft Auto Game Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
"The senator spoke after delivering a speech on protecting children from exposure to sex- and violence-saturated media."
Can you believe this statement?--Shery
Excellent point. (I had included that statement because I was planning to comment on it; got diverted, however.) ;)
addressing the UN, 3.4.99
In a letter she is sending Thursday to the Federal Trade Commission, Mrs. Clinton expressed concern over reports that anyone who used a free code downloaded over the Internet could unlock sexually graphic images hidden inside the game, called Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.
Mrs. Clinton asked the commission to determine "the source of this content," especially since the game can fall into the hands of young people.
RAYMOND HERNANDEZ
The New York Times
by Gail Wynand
f missus clinton
is serious
about keeping
pornography downloads
from our kids,
she
and that... husband... of hers
will upload themselves
straightaway
to
Chappaqua... or wherever...
and stay clear of
the Oval Office
--and the public square--
forever.
For the children?
the clintons ARE pornography downloads
by Mia T, 7.14.05
bump! see #68.
A recent poll reveals that barely a majority of New Yorkers (51%) think she's doing ok as senator. Much lower than the other high-profile senators.. McCain, for example, is in the 7o percent range. Even Kerry is in the 60s. And, Kennedy, with all his baggage, well exceeds clinton.
It is not impossible that New Yorkers will reconsider... what with all hillary's negative press of late.... I mean, they voted for her only because of her cachet. No cachet, no vote... perhaps....
fyi
For the sake of our aesthetic sensibilities, could you kindly choose a different metaphor? ;)
hillary clinton always negotiates all debate out of the debate. Someone like Ann would demolish her, nonetheless.
Do you ever try to refute the D talking points?
I find that when you refute them with evidence that the clintons were self-serving rather than simply incompetent--(they were/are actually both--that gets them thinking...
A good example of this is an explanation of why clinton refused to take bin Laden, refused to take on the terrorists.
The Witch and her flying monkeys are doing their best to make Ann a billionaire with this book. They might even make Ann richer than Rush. GO ANN!!!
the clintons ARE porn.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.