Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ardmoreokie
Sorry, I disagree. They have fought outside of China in the recent past (Korea, Tibet, Vietnam etc.), they are expanmding now in terms of influence that can be both economic and military (Spratleys, Panama, S. America, Africa, Iran, etc.), and they are rapidly building a modern, blue-water navy.


12 posted on 06/13/2006 2:09:00 PM PDT by Jeff Head (God, family, country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Head

Korea, Tibet and Vietnam all lie within China's historic sphere of influence. Korea (with the "help" of Japan) declared independence from Qing China only until the late 1800's, right up to the collapse of the Qing. Tibet was also part of Qing China. The PRC today (as did the ROC) claims itself as the modern successor state of the Great Qing Empire.

My point was that the Chinese have never fought in a campaign that did not have a historical context with itself. Nor have the Chinese engaged in war with a country that did not border it or was never claimed as Chinese territory.

With consideration of these points, one can reasonably say that the only foreseeable Chinese engagement in the near future is over Taiwan. Not over Africa, Iran or S America.


13 posted on 06/13/2006 3:43:33 PM PDT by ardmoreokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson