There was a peep. . .i.e. a very small one, made by Drudge; Ann's 'swiping response' to Hillary actually reported/headlined. So amazed, I responded with her comment on a thread; noting 'as per Drudge' (soon to be my reality check). . .
Upon checking back to Drudge so as to revel a bit in this public framing; found Ann had been 'deleted' and only Swiper Hillary remained - and for days - while Ann's response was no more than a moment in time; at least by Drudge measure.
She was not even respectfully archived. . .but perhaps I just missed the rest of the story. . .
That said, Mia, you are right; the swipe to Hillary, should have been a 'blow'. Clinton truth requires/demands just that. . .otherwise, it is too easy for the 'et als' to just ignore and/or delete.
Meantime, kudos to Ann for 'swiping' Hillary, where it really hurts; and I hope she knocks her bigtime. . .next time. . .
Indeed. By focusing the world's attention on the clinton rape of Broaddrick, Coulter did a great service for us all.
The purpose of this thread is to sharpen the focus.
Simply telling hillary to talk to her husband about the rape only perpetuates the myth of missus clinton's 'victimhood.'
should have been a 'blow'
Like what?