On the other hand, if the mother didn't adopt out the baby, and kept it herself, she could sue him for child support as long as she kept the secret from him long enough that his year-to-object expired.
Yes, but considering the intangible
relationship he had with her family,
he should thank his lucky stars he's
rid of her. He obviously didn't
satisfy her idea of a husband/father
to her kids. I suggest she saw a
lucrative "out" in deceiving him and
putting the new baby up for adoption.
By doing so, she got rid of him, the
unwanted child, and a financial bonus.
Complications always arise when two
people are more concerned about them-
selves than about their responsibilities.
IMO, the baby is 100% better off. Wish
I could assume as much about the other
two kiddoes!
Yep.
Information one needs to tell ones' sons, accompanied by a whipping with a big brown belt, even if said said son is a teenager.
MWT, Sr. did just that when I was messing around with a very good looking little senorita that --- in hindsight --- didn't give a damn about me, but wanted to get pregnant by the ranch-owner's son. (She got knocked up about 6 months later by the son of another well-to-do family.)