Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

INTELLIGENCE: Why Iraq WMD Finds Were Kept Secret
Strategy Page ^ | 2006 Jun 23 | Harold C. Hutchison

Posted on 06/24/2006 11:17:55 AM PDT by Wiz

June 23, 2006: The revelation that Coalition forces have discovered about 500 shells containing chemical weapons (mostly sarin nerve gas and mustard gas) since 2003, most of which are pre-1991 Gulf War vintage, leads to the question as to why the U.S. waited so long to reveal this. The U.S. government has taken a beating for supposed failures to find weapons of mass destruction in the press, and from political opponents. There have been some discoveries that have made the news, most notably an incident in May, 2004, when terrorists used a 155-millimeter shell loaded with sarin in an IED. The shell detonated, exposing two soldiers to sarin nerve gas (both of whom survived and recovered). It is this attack that provides one explanation as to why many of the finds have been classified.

If the United States were to have announced WMD finds right away, it could have told terrorists (including those from al-Qaeda) where to look to locate chemical weapons. This would have placed troops at risk – for a marginal gain in public relations. A successful al-Qaeda chemical attack would have been a huge boost for their propaganda efforts as well, enabling them to get recruits and support (many people want to back a winner), and it would have caused a decline in American morale in Iraq and on the home front.

(Excerpt) Read more at strategypage.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 155mmshell; 2003; 2004; 200405; alqaeda; alqaida; binaryshell; gas; iraq; iraqiintelligence; iraqiwmds; islamist; mustard; nervegas; nuketheleft; oif; sarin; terrorism; terrorist; waronterror; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
To: King Prout
okay, she's a hottie, but... what are her politics?

Remember, left chicks are easy!

41 posted on 06/24/2006 12:14:12 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

Ping and binny boy is dead?


42 posted on 06/24/2006 12:17:44 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Not one US soldier has lived, that has been captured by terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: killjoy

They're still sick basturds for setting IED's. Damn them all to Hooters. That would serve them right. All those half neeked women strutting around. They're so fond of making their women wear burkas.


43 posted on 06/24/2006 12:17:55 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The real problem is tracking down all the hidden stuff that SH hid in the countryside.

I believe that the huge pile of documents that we secured in the fall of Iraq have finally been transcribed, read and assimilated into the intel computers and the administration feels secure that most, if not all of the WMD stuff has been collected or identified in other countries.

My guess is that the sarin shell IED was rigged as if it was an ordinary high explosive round, and that the bad guys just thought it would go BOOM. If we let them know that the shell was really C/B masquerading as HE 155, well that would really have the bad guys racing around the countryside, like diseased rats, looking to SELL the C/B rounds to other like minded nuts outside of Iraq.
44 posted on 06/24/2006 12:18:05 PM PDT by Mr. Jazzy (Mr. Jazzy, VPD of LCpl Smoothguy242, USMC, now back HOME! Ooorah!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr
I also think the definition of WMD has gotten stretched a bit over the past few years.

I disagree. WMD's are still chemical (e.g. Sarin, Mustard gas), biological (e.g. anthrax, botcholism), or radiological (nukes) weapons.

45 posted on 06/24/2006 12:18:10 PM PDT by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI

You're welcome.


46 posted on 06/24/2006 12:22:07 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

They played it as a pass off and not much else.


47 posted on 06/24/2006 12:27:18 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT
(Not one US soldier has lived, that has been captured by terrorist.)

Ronald D. Young Jr., David S. Williams, Edgar Hernandez, Joseph Hudson, Shoshana Johnson, Patrick Miller, James Riley, Jessica Lynch...

48 posted on 06/24/2006 12:29:49 PM PDT by killjoy (Dirka dirka mohammed jihad! Sherpa sherpa bakalah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Rather we be demeaned and ridiculed than call a spade a spade?
49 posted on 06/24/2006 12:31:08 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
Great Article, the truth comes out.
50 posted on 06/24/2006 12:43:08 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

You are correct, an interesting view, that makes sense to me.


51 posted on 06/24/2006 12:50:42 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (Lord ,when we are wrong,make us willing to change. And when we are right, make us easy to live with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
He writes this. "I had forgotten that federal prosecutors designated Jack Murtha an unindicted coconspirator in the Abscam investigation 26 years ago.">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not only that, but the special prosecutor for ABSCAM resigned when the comittee, controlled by Democraps, refused to indict Murtha. The prosecutor had him COLD, and Murtha would have done time.

52 posted on 06/24/2006 12:51:05 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TypeZoNegative

I'd hit it.


53 posted on 06/24/2006 12:51:48 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JoeGar

Botcholism? My fridge could qualify as a WMD in that case.


54 posted on 06/24/2006 12:54:25 PM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

OBL, will never die.........it would break the jihadi's heart.


55 posted on 06/24/2006 12:59:24 PM PDT by nw_arizona_granny (Lord ,when we are wrong,make us willing to change. And when we are right, make us easy to live with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I'm glad those two soldiers weren't badly hurt because of it.


56 posted on 06/24/2006 1:00:34 PM PDT by processing please hold (If you can't stand behind our military, stand in front of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Yeah.. the rules have been different for the RATS for many years. If we can keep them out of office and/or off of powerful committees, then privatize a lot of the work being done by the treasonous feather-bedding RATS who make up the permanent bureaucracy at all levels of government - we would be going a long way towards neutralizing them and the protection racket they run.


57 posted on 06/24/2006 1:03:46 PM PDT by Matchett-PI ( "History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or the timid." -- Dwight Eisenhower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pbrown; SandRat
I don't have a link, but I remember reading about it as well. As I recall, it was a binary shell, and the fact that it didn't get spun down a tube and then in flight, was thought to be the reason why it didn't have much efficacy (insufficient mixing of the binary components).
58 posted on 06/24/2006 1:11:00 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pete

It does make sense. It's kind of like on 24, where the fictional president was complicent in nerve gas being sold to terrorists and in the assasination of a former US President. It was decided that revealing this information to the public was in the country's best interest.

It still annoys me that so many people have called me a lunatic anytime I tell them I believe there are/were WMD's in Iraq.


59 posted on 06/24/2006 1:32:25 PM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
This makes sense to me, and this is something I've wondered about for a long time (for reasons I cannot go into). I think it also speaks volumes about President Bush that he put the troops ahead of any political gain he'd have gotten from trumpeting these finds.
60 posted on 06/24/2006 1:32:39 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (The MSM is "the propaganda arm of our enemies." - Jack Kelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson