Corruption: Cannon aide found guilty

ProjectUSA ^ | 22 June 2006 | ProjectUSA

[Spiff]

Oooo..."Closely associated"

Why are you attempting this lame distraction? You can't argue the content of the article so you're trying to play six degrees of separation between some Internet site that you don't like and the place where I got this article.

So, to counter the inane stuff you're trying here, I'm going to post Cannon's voting record once again. Thanks for the inspiration:

Cannon's atrocious voting record:

• Voted on House floor against amendment to HR 4437 to end visa lottery in 2005

• Cosponsored legislation that includes provision to increase chain migration in 2005-2006

• Voted against amendment to prohibit immigration increases in Free Trade Agreements in 2005

• Voted for sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2006

  Voted against amendment to end special amnesty for certain Central Americans in 2006

• Voted on the floor of the House against amendment to require implementation of entry-exit system in 2005

• Voted on House floor against amendment to clarify local law enforcement's authority to enforce immigration laws in 2005

• Voted in favor of sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2005 H.Amdt. 288 to HR 2862)

• Voted in favor of sanctuary policies for illegal aliens in 2005 (H.Amdt. 138 to HR 2360)

  Cosponsoring bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty in 2005-2006

• Voted against amendment to increase interior enforcement in 2005

• Cosponsored bill to create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers in 2005-2006

• Voted against enforcing federal laws against sanctuary policies to protect illegal aliens in 2004 (H.Amdt. 655 to HR 4754)

• Voted in favor of sanctuary policies to protect illegal aliens in 2004 (H.Amdt. 583 to HR 4567)

• Cosponsored amnesty for Colombians and Peruvians in 2003-2004

• Cosponsored so-called guestworker program to create amnesty for illegal aliens in 2003-2004 (HR 1684)

• Cosponsored bill to reward illegal aliens with in-state tuition rates and amnesty in 2003-2004 (HR 1300)

• Cosponsored bill to reward illegal aliens with amnesty in 2003-2004

• Co-sponsored bill to reward illegal aliens with in-state tuition rates and amnesty in 2001-2002

• Co-sponsored legislation to grant amnesty to over 2 million illegal aliens in 2002

• Voted FOR Section 245(i), a form of amnesty for illegal aliens in 2002

• Voted in favor of a four-month extension of Section 245(i) in 2001

• Cosponsored bill to create an amnesty for illegal agricultural workers in 2003-2004

• Voted AGAINST killing pro-illegal-alien Section 245(i) program in 1997

Cannon's voting record also demonstrates an anti-sovereignty, pro-globalist agenda:

• Voted YES on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade. (Jul 2005)
  
• Voted NO on withdrawing from the WTO. (Jun 2000)
  
• Voted YES on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements. (Sep 1998)
• Voted NO on deterring foreign arms transfers to China. (Jul 2005)
  
• Voted NO on keeping Cuba travel ban until political prisoners released. (Jul 2001)
  
• Voted YES on Most Favored Nation Trade Relations with China. (May 2000)
  

Grades Updated: June 23, 2006

SUBJECT

Reduce Enticement AMNESTIES for Illegal Immigration

GRADES

Career	Recent

Comparisons of Cannon Career record with others:

Utah Delegation	0	have grades BELOW Cannon		3	have grades ABOVE Cannon		View Full List
Utah Republicans	0	have grades BELOW Cannon		3	have grades ABOVE Cannon		View Full List
All House Republicans	0	have grades BELOW Cannon		179	have grades ABOVE Cannon		View Full List
Everybody in House	0	have grades BELOW Cannon		215	have grades ABOVE Cannon		View Full List
All House and Senate	0	have grades BELOW Cannon		283	have grades ABOVE Cannon		View Full List

w w w . b e t t e r i m m i g r a t i o n . c o m

[Texasforever]

Spiff answer the question why is Jacobs getting endorsements from white supremest sites? Why are you posting those endorsements?

[Spiff]

Spiff answer the question why is Jacobs getting endorsements from white supremest sites? Why are you posting those endorsements?

Number one, moron, the question was never asked.

Number two, idiot, ProjectUSA is not a "white supremacist" site.

Three, the article was not an endorsement of anyone but instead reported that a former Cannon aide was found guilty of corruption. Cannon's opponent, John Jacob, was not even mentioned in the article.

So, your attempts at distraction are not only pathetic and wrong, but mark you as a fool.

[Pelham]

FR hates Vdare. It is forbidden on this site.

Then the mods ought to hold you accountable for bringing up Vdare, since you were the guilty party. The article doesn't mention it and no one else was discussing it until you brought VDare up in your posts.

[Texasforever]

Number two, idiot, ProjectUSA is not a "white supremacist" site.

Then why do they boast about their close association with Vdare?

[Texasforever]

Nope, just pointing out the linkages.

[Altura Ct.]

You can always tell when someone has no argument as they resort to name calling.

[Texasforever]

You can always tell when someone has no argument as they resort to name calling.

Me or the one calling me a moron?

[Pelham]

TF is engaging in that tired guilt-by-accusation strategy that hard left outfits like the SPLC have long used against all immigration reform organizations.

We used to have a poster here who constantly posted the SPLC's smears, which is how I eventually tracked down the source. The same material was used in Cannon's press releases last election cycle when he was trying to hide his open border extremism by accusing his critics of being racists, white supremicists, the whole litany TF is repeating. Golden Oldies from the hard left's cesspool.

[MikeA]

I must have missed the indictment of Chris Cannon...

[Texasforever]

TF is engaging in that tired guilt-by-accusation strategy that hard left outfits like the SPLC have long used against all immigration reform organizations.

BS. ProjectUSA boasts of their association with VDARE they are proud of it.

[Pelham]

Whereas you hide your association with La Raza and the SPLC?

[Spiff]

TF is engaging in that tired guilt-by-accusation strategy that hard left outfits like the SPLC have long used against all immigration reform organizations. We used to have a poster here who constantly posted the SPLC's smears, which is how I eventually tracked down the source. The same material was used in Cannon's press releases last election cycle when he was trying to hide his open border extremism by accusing his critics of being racists, white supremicists, the whole litany TF is repeating. Golden Oldies from the hard left's cesspool.

Thanks. I was wondering where the guy was getting that garbage. All I did was post a news story about a former Cannon aide being found guilty of corruption and he's telling me that I'm posting endorsements from white supremacists and such. What a weed.

[Texasforever]

Whereas you hide your association with La Raza and the SPLC?

LOL. Now back to the question at hand. Why is Jacobs relying on endorsements from white supremest organizations?

[Texasforever]

Thanks. I was wondering where the guy was getting that garbage. All I did was post a news story about a former Cannon aide being found guilty of corruption and he's telling me that I'm posting endorsements from white supremacists and such. What a weed.

Well your ALIPAC endorsement lasted 2 seconds. Now again, why does PROJECTUSA boast about their close association with VDARE if they do not share VDARE's positions?

[Altura Ct.]

Whereas you hide your association with La Raza and the SPLC?

Typical double standard.

NCLR TO HONOR SENATOR CHRISTOPHER DODD, CONGRESSMAN CHRIS CANNON, AND THE LLANO GRANDE CENTER AT 2005 CAPITAL AWARDS GALA

http://www.nclr.org/content/news/detail/29622/

[Pelham]

Now back to the question at hand. Why is Jacobs relying on endorsements from white supremest organizations?

Flunked logic, did you? Or are you counting on no one catching you employing the fallacy of the Complex Question, where you smuggle your accusation into your question as if its fact? Try again, pindejo.

[WatchingInAmazement]

To: Texasforever

Then the mods ought to hold you accountable for bringing up Vdare, since you were the guilty party. The article doesn't mention it and no one else was discussing it until you brought VDare up in your posts.

HALLELUJAH!!!

[Pelham]

You notice he's still posting, despite bringing up The Forbidden Site. Apparently his attempt to sabotage the thread didn't work. But he'll keep trying.

[Texasforever]

What's the matter can't stand a bit of sunlight?