Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Mach 3 missile advances
Flight International ^ | 04/07/06 | Graham Warwick in Washington DC

Posted on 07/04/2006 1:34:43 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Mach 3 missile advances

By Graham Warwick in Washington DC

Lockheed Martin is nearing the crit­ical design review on a technology demonstrator for a Mach 3-plus cruise missile that could be air, ship and submarine-launched. The missile would be accelerated from subsonic launch to supersonic cruise by a turbine engine, and could fly 920km (500nm) or more in 15min to attack time-critical targets.

The demonstrator is being de­signed for the US Office of Naval Research (ONR) under the Revolutionary Approach to Time-critical Long-Range Strike (RATTLRS) project. Lockheed’s Skunk Works is prime contractor. Rolls-Royce’s Liberty Works is building the YJ102R high-Mach turbine engine for the demonstrator.

First ground runs of the complete engine are planned for early next year, says Lockheed programme manager Craig Johnston. Construction of the integrated vehicle will begin around the same time, with the first launch from a Lockheed NC-130F planned for late next year in the Pacific test range off Pt Mugu, California.

Before the end of this year, sled tests are planned to demonstrate payloads planned for an operational weapon – including subsonic and supersonic submunitions dispensing and supersonic penetrator delivery – says ONR programme manager Lawrence Ash.

Johnston says the goal of RATTLRS, which is a US Navy-led joint project with the US Air Force, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and NASA, is to reduce risk to where development of an operational weapon could be launched before the end of the decade.

Ash says the YJ102R has six times the specific thrust of the Pratt & Whitney J58 that powered the Lockheed SR-71, and will accelerate the missile to M3 without reheat. The airframe is similar in shape and size to an SR-71 engine nacelle, but the YJ102R is only 330mm (13in) in diameter yet produces half the dry thrust of the four times larger J58, at 6% of the weight, he says.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: armsbuildup; brahmosmissile; china; cruisemissile; india; lockheedmartin; miltech; navy; rattlrs; russia; supersonic; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

© Lockheed Martin

Mach 3 missile demonstrator resembles an SR-71 engine

1 posted on 07/04/2006 1:34:47 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Haven't we been here before?


Mach 4+ D-21B recon drone

2 posted on 07/04/2006 1:45:47 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Beautiful


3 posted on 07/04/2006 1:45:53 AM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Nuclear capable?


4 posted on 07/04/2006 1:50:03 AM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Most probably,but will probably not need those given the K.E it will generate on impact.


5 posted on 07/04/2006 1:54:32 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: sukhoi-30mki

Its a very beautiful design.


8 posted on 07/04/2006 2:01:18 AM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki


http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/brahmos.htm

India expects to significantly enhance its long-range strike abilities with the BrahMos cruise missile, jointly developed by New Delhi and Moscow. The supersonic missile -- which derives its name from the Brahmaputra and Moscow rivers in both countries - has a range of almost 300 km and is designed for use with land, sea and aerial platforms. The Indian Air Force (IAF) is reportedly considering the possibility of fitting the BrahMos on its Su-30 combat jets. The production will commence by end of 2003 for induction in the year 2004.

The BrahMos, a derivative of the Yakhont, was developed by a joint venture between India's Defence Research and Development Organisation and Russia's NPO Mashinostroyenia. The BrahMos missile is a product of an Indo-Russian joint venture known by the same name. Registered in December 1995, the company was set up as a result of an inter-governmental agreement between Russia and India, eventually signed in February 1998, to design, develop, produce and market a supersonic cruise missile jointly.

India and Russia plan to begin the induction of the jointly-developed BrahMos supersonic cruise missile into their armed forces by the end of 2003. However, according to some reports military officials believe it is several years away from induction into the navy or the air force.

The BrahMos missile is a two-stage vehicle that has a solid propellant booster and a liquid (propellant) ram jet system.

The jointly developed Indo-Russian anti-ship cruise missile, which was successfully test-fired from Chandipur interim test range in Orissa, is a crucial step forward in India's defence efforts. This technological achievement places India among a small group of countries to acquire the capacity of producing cruise missiles. What, however, makes the jointly produced cruise missile distinguishable from others is that it travels at a supersonic speed i.e. more than twice the speed of sound. Almost all other contemporary anti-ship missiles fly at subsonic speed. Its other distinguishing feature is that the Indo-Russian cruise missile is a state-of-the-art product.

Its unmatchable speed is its high point, making it invincible. The supersonic speed imparts it a greater strike-power as well. Possessing stealth characteristics, the 6.9-meter cruise missile weighing three tons has a range of 280 km. Its another outstanding feature is that it is highly accurate and can be guided to its target mainly with the help of an onboard computer. This has been established by the test-flight. The computer and the guidance system have been designed by India whereas Russia has provided the propulsion system.

Test flights of the PJ-10 occurred on 12 June 2001, 28 April 2002, with a third test expected in June 2002. The test-firing of the cruise missile which took place in the middle of June 2001 was described as an unqualified success. The Brahmos recorded its performance as having met technical parameters, both in terms of the flight range and hitting accuracy. Defence Minister Jaswant Singh who was present at Chandipur along with Indian and Russian scientists and technologists described the launch as a "landmark in technology partnership".

The Chandipur launch was the first in a series of test-flights of the cruise missile planned to demonstrate the capabilities of the system. A series of other test-flights will take place before the missile is simultaneously inducted into the Indian and Russian arsenals. It will also be sold to third countries in due course of time.

One of its special features is that this essentially anti-ship missile can be launched from ground, ship, submarine or air. Defence analysts underline that the eventual addition of this strategic missile is a logical follow-up of the goal set as per the country 's nuclear philosophy. Stated in plain terms, it is essential for the fulfilment of India's minimum nuclear deterrent profile as outlined in the draft nuclear doctrine prepared by the Vajpayee Government. The acquisition of the cruise missile which can be tipped with a nuclear warhead has obvious implications for our nuclear weapons' delivery system.

In order to avoid controversy, both India and Russia have taken care to ensure that the production of the cruise missile did not violate obligations under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) or any of the international agreements related to proliferation. That is why the missile range is well within the 300 km limit stipulated under the MTCR.

Both India and Russia welcomed the joint development of the supersonic cruise missile with great exuberance. Elated at the successful test flight from Chandipur, the state-owned Russian collaborating company, Mashinostroyenie, put the cruise missile on display at the Moscow annual air show. Mashinostroyenie designed the missile and its propulsion system, leaving the all-important software and the guidance system to its Indian counterpart— the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) of the Defence Ministry.

New Delhi described the missile as an "outstanding example of Indo-Russian joint endeavour". The President, Mr KR Narayanan and Prime Minister Mr Vajpayee termed it as a symbol of defence cooperation between the two countries.The development of the cruise missile takes their decades-old defence cooperation and the revived post-Cold War strategic partnership to a new high. It may be recalled that during the Russian President, Mr Vladimir Putin's visit to India in October 2000, a Joint Declaration of Strategic Partnership was issued. During the Defence Minister, Mr Jaswant Singh's visit to Moscow a few days before the Chandipur launch, this strategic relationship was further reinforced. On these two occasions, the two countries signed a series of agreements on the acquisition of sophisticated weapon system and for a joint production of some of them including missiles.

The newly developed cruise missile is more than a match to similar anti-ship missiles available with China. The latter has mounted Moskit anti-ship missiles on its recently acquired Soverameny-class warships. Beijing is also planning to mount its aerial version of the Moskit on its SU-27 planes. The Indian cruise missile with its supersonic speed will be able to check movements by the Chinese warships, especially in the Indian Ocean area. Besides, its extraordinary accuracy and speed increases the range of its targets.

9 posted on 07/04/2006 2:13:10 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr; garbageseeker; F15Eagle
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us French-German VESTA Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Indo-Russian Yakhont/Brahmos
10 posted on 07/04/2006 2:23:42 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Very beautiful in design. I hate to be at the receiving end of one of these.
11 posted on 07/04/2006 2:33:33 AM PDT by garbageseeker (It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.”Samuel Clemmens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Hmmmm

When can I get one of these engines for my dragster?
12 posted on 07/04/2006 2:45:35 AM PDT by Pontiac (All are worthy of freedom, none are incapable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Lockheed bump!

13 posted on 07/04/2006 2:53:13 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Per Tony Montana, "Hey Osama, let me introduce you to my little friend"!
14 posted on 07/04/2006 3:00:29 AM PDT by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

The design looks "retro" to me; I wonder if it has stealth capabilities, or if it is deemed to be unnecessary at that speed?


15 posted on 07/04/2006 6:01:28 AM PDT by I-ambush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
The newly developed cruise missile is more than a match to similar anti-ship missiles available with China.

But if the Russians co-own the BrahMos missile, won't they also sell it to China, as they do with all of their other military technology?

16 posted on 07/04/2006 6:31:59 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

Umm well India would have to agree to that & Sino-Indo ties have never been in the pink of health since China attacked in 1962 & with it still arming Pakistan.


17 posted on 07/04/2006 6:36:46 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: denydenydeny

The Brahmos venture has to be seen as being akin to the Eurofighter consortium.All involved parties have to agree to hawk the thing.

Anyway,China has been unable to obtain the SSN-26 Yakhont from Russia,which is the basis for the joint Brahmos.They have had to make do with the SSN-22 Sunburn & its improvements.


18 posted on 07/04/2006 6:38:34 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I hope so. I don't trust the Russians.


19 posted on 07/04/2006 6:39:06 AM PDT by denydenydeny ("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki; garbageseeker
Most probably,but will probably not need those given the K.E it will generate on impact.

Will a terminal velocity of Mach 3 be useful in urban/built up targets? If it flies in low, it can't "turn corners" and find a specific target in a mass of buildings. If it comes in high, it has to have a (relatively?) wide turn radius to "zero in on the chimney." But if its got a large kT warhead, and doesn't use KE, then it can take whatever trajectory it wants and in that case, "close counts."

20 posted on 07/04/2006 7:35:29 AM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson