Liberal Meltdown Mode!
Hey Kerry, have you checked out the anti-semitism from the Moonbats at Kos and Huff Post? The anti-war crowd wants to throw Isreal to the wolves. The equate Hezbollah with IDF. Thousands of young Jewish Dems are switching over to the GOP, and its not b/c of Rush, its because of weasels like you who refuse to stand for anything.
And once again, thanks for the tagline...
Ah, Kerry. Desperate to be back on the A list. Dead man walking.
And if the Democratic party had continued to live up to the foreign policy principles of Harry Truman, they would have won more than 3 of the last 10 presidential elections.
Pick up a doughnut? Is Kerry stuck in the mid '90s? Rush hasn't been overweight in a long time, you ass.
Uh, Kerry...Rush has lost weight.
"It was a Democratic president who first recognized the State of Israel. It was a Democratic president who first sold Israel defensive weapons. And it was a Democratic president who first sold Israel offensive weapons."
That was then, Ketchup Boy, when your POS political party used to stand firm with Republicans on national defense. If Israel today got nuked you and your fellow Rats would be breaking out the Cristal.
Oh, please, not THAT one, John.
"Rush Limbaugh needs to pick up a history book instead of a doughnut," Kerry added.
What an a**hole.
Maybe we've got a genetic defect?
Dry Bones
Israel's Political Comic Strip Since 1973
John Kerry cites historical Democrats' support of Israel as his defense of the Democrats/Liberal stance against Israel?
When Kerry's right, he's right... Harry Truman was president when Israel became an independant nation. Harry Truman was president when Israel was attacked by all its neighbors that very same day. So, I suppose that it would have been difficult for a Republican president to be the first... I believe that Marshall opposed supporting Israel, but Clark Clifford won out that argument before Truman...
Mark
Tuesday, March 9, 2004
Kerry: Arafat Is No Longer a 'Statesman'
John Kerry is flip-flopping again in response to the New York Post's revelation that he praised Muslim terrorist leader Yasser Arafat as a "role model" and "statesman" at least as recently as 1997.
Kerry 'met with Arafat. After September 11. After Bill Clinton blamed Arafat for the Oslo collapse. After George W. Bush refused to meet with Arafat. After Arafat had commenced a barbaric war against Israel. After that - and in the midst of that - he meets with Arafat. And he came away from that meeting thinking the answer is to appoint Jimmy Carter as presidential envoy and start the negotiations with Taba.'"
http://tinyurl.com/h73rv
Now although there are many reasons one might want to vote for John F. Kerry, remembering Jerusalem — remembering to stand up for the state of Israel — is not among them.
It is true that Kerry's campaign pronouncements have been unexceptionable from the pro-Zionist point of view. Yes, he flip-flopped on the miles of trenches and fences Israel is building to defend itself from the plague of terrorism, first attacking the structure as "another barrier to peace," then accepting it as "a legitimate act of self-defense."
He has also floundered concerning what can be expected of Yasser Arafat. Just as Arafat was launching the second intifada in 2000, Kerry asserted optimistically that we must "look to Chairman Arafat to exert much greater leadership." Three days later, he portentously declared the obvious on CBS' "Face the Nation," calling the Israel-Palestinian conflict "an extraordinarily complicated, incredibly deep-rooted problem." What made this problem so extraordinary and incredible? "Arafat has forces around him, underneath him, close by him that don't want peace, that are working against what he is doing," Kerry said by way of exoneration. (And, to sustain the moral equivalence of the parties in his head, he added, "The same is true of Prime Minister [Ehud] Barak" — which was nonsense, as there wasn't a single such person in Barak's circle.)
Kerry asserted on "Meet the Press" that it is "Israel's presence [in the territories that] puts Israel in difficult circumstances and obviously creates an enormous handle for Osama bin Laden for all the radicals and extremists to hang on to."
http://tinyurl.com/zfrfa
Can't wait to hear Rush kick this pansy's butt next week!
******
For many leaders of pro-Israel organizations, Kerry's pledge to "treat the United Nations as a full partner" simply added to the discomfort--given that institution's decades-long record of singling out the Jewish state for opprobrium. "It's patently obvious that international institutions have a real animus toward Israel," says David Twersky of the American Jewish Congress, "and, if a president wants to be enmeshed by the U.N., it will of course be injurious to Israel." In a similar vein, Kerry's vow that, "as president, I will engage Iran" hardly sits well with those who view the Islamic republic as the greatest threat to the Jewish state. "Christ, even [Representative] Jerry Nadler has been telling [the Kerry team] to take a hard line toward Iran," says the leader of a major American Jewish organization.
******
The Republican Jewish Coalition has been drawing attention to some other recent endorsements of Kerry, which it says Jewish voters should be worried about - those of the Arab-American PAC and the Muslim-American PAC.
"Clearly these groups do not support President Bush because of his unwavering support for Israel and his relentless war against Islamic terrorists," RJC executive director Matthew Brooks said in a statement Monday.
"The endorsements of John Kerry by these two anti-Israel groups speaks volumes and should serve as a warning to Jewish Americans who think John Kerry is on their side."
Man do they ever hate being called out in public like that, especially when it threatens one of their "secure" voting blocks.
Kerry stepped in it. Challenging Rush! lol!
Rush is going to take him apart, piece by piece.
Oh this is going to be good Monday. Poor Kerry.