Iraqi soldiers’ progress steady despite logistical challenges

CAMP AL ASAD, Iraq (July 24, 2006) -- Iraqi Army officers serving alongside Marines on this U.S. military air base in Al Anbar province are learning how to plan their own missions – a critical step to independent operations for Iraqi Security Forces, according to Marine officials here.

Iraqi leadership within the 2nd Brigade, 7th Iraqi Army Division – one of two Iraqi brigades based in the province – are learning how to evaluate intelligence, organize information and conduct well-thought mission-planning briefs.

“These guys have to be able to communicate … and support their battalions, and provide command and control for them,” said Lt. Col. Greg A. Branigan, who spearheads the team of U.S. service members who mentor and train the brigade’s soldiers.

The 2nd Brigade is the higher headquarters for its three battalions, which are spread throughout Al Anbar province. Ultimately, the brigade will have to take operational control of its subordinate battalions – putting the brigade one step closer to independency from U.S. support, the Marines said. And to effectively control and support its battalions, the brigade’s leaders must master crucial skills such as systematic operational planning.

“We want them to recognize the need to re-supply their battalions. They come up with the plan, and we’re along for the ride -- as opposed to them along for the ride with us,” said Branigan, who said U.S. Marines here will eventually serve just as a “back-up” to the brigade, providing occasional services such as medical support and extra firepower on the battlefield.

The Marines said they want to reinforce and adapt existing Iraqi methods. A few brigade staff officers served under Saddam Hussein’s regime and have formal training in military planning methods.

“We take what they’ve got as a starting point, and build upon it,” said Branigan.

Multinational forces also plan to create a brigade command operations center -- a nerve center for ongoing operations and a hub for communications, intelligence and situation reports for battlefield commanders and their subordinate units’ actions.

Currently, the battalions under 2nd Brigade operate solely with their partnered U.S. military units, conducting counterinsurgency operations and training to operate independently of U.S. forces. The battalions are not under 2nd Brigade's administrative or operational control – something that should change within the next six months as long as the Iraqi soldiers receive the support they need, according to Capt. Peter A. Wilson, the logistics advisor for 2nd Brigade’s military transition team.

“The soldiers are willing to fight,” said Wilson, a 31-year-old from Oxford, Ohio. “If they’ve got good chow, a good place to live, they’ll stay and fight.”

But the road to the Iraqi Army’s progress in Al Anbar province is not just a matter of teaching young Jundi – the Iraqi term for enlisted soldiers – how to shoot their weapons, or having Iraqi officers plan and brief counterinsurgency operations, according to Marine officials.

Marines who have spent the past six months working daily with Iraqi Army units in this vast region of western Iraq note that it’s the “big three” – pay, chow and leave – which are perhaps the most critical constituents to any Iraqi Army unit’s success in Al Anbar province.

“Men who are worried about their pay, their families, and their sustenance are not going to be focused on the tactical tasks at hand,” said Maj. Victor J. Bunch Sr., who leads the U.S. military transition team for 1st Battalion, 2nd Brigade, in Hit, Iraq, a mostly Sunni city 70 miles northwest of Ramadi.

Bunch’s transition team of U.S. service members work daily with 2nd Brigade’s 1st Battalion, whose soldiers are now planning and leading their own patrols – a sharp turn from just a few months ago when U.S. forces led patrols with Iraqi soldiers in tow.

In Haditha, the Brigade’s 2nd Battalion has also had numerous successes in the past half year: The battalion has conducted 10 independent, company-sized military operations and conducts all of its own convoys, supplying food, water and ammunition to its companies.

Lt. Col. Owen R. Lovejoy II, who leads 2nd Battalion’s military transition team, agrees with Wilson: “The (Iraqi Army) will fight well when they are trained, led and equipped.”

Still, despite the notable military progress Iraqi soldiers have made, Bunch says his team spends about “30 to 40 percent” of its time trying to ensure the Iraqi soldiers receive the “big three.”

“We have seen improvement of late, especially in the capability of the (Ministry of Defense) to address and rectify pay problems,” he said.

“We’re constantly looking for new solutions – an Iraqi solution to an Iraqi problem,” said Branigan. “All the right people are working on these issues, (but) nothing happens fast here.”

With no electronic banking in place, Iraqi soldiers must be paid in cash. Once paid, they have to bring their paychecks home to their families, which require long periods of leave – 10 days of leave every 20 days they serve in uniform.

The soldiers, who are mostly Shiites from towns and villages outside Al Anbar province, often have to travel hundreds of miles from their unit’s locations to reach their homes and give their pay to their families, which means less time in uniform serving with their military units.

“That is like going home on leave from Jacksonville, Fla., to Washington, D.C., through an area where the security situation is less than safe,” said Lovejoy.

Still, the current leave policy is an improvement over the old policy in terms of job satisfaction, said Branigan.

The old leave policy allowed Iraqi soldiers to take 10 days of leave every 30 days of service.

Under the old leave policy, as many as 100 soldiers either returned late, or did not return at all after their 10 days of leave on any give month.

That’s changed, thanks in part to the new leave policy, said Branigan. Since the new leave policy’s induction, 2nd Brigade has seen a decrease in the amount of soldiers who don’t return from leave. Last month, about 50 soldiers did not return to the brigade following their leave. The month before that, 460 soldiers went on leave, and 460 returned.

“I think we’re seeing the trend turn here,” said Branigan. “Things are getting better. Every month, we’re able to pay people…and fix some discrepancies. We’ll get there.”

In Hit, Bunch has also seen a decrease in the number of Iraqi soldiers who don’t return to 1st Battalion after monthly leave.

“At one point in time, it was not uncommon for us to regularly have more than 15-percent of our battalion AWOL (absent without leave),” said Bunch. “That number has shrunk recently to about five percent.”

Currently, there are no Iraqi government regulations which bind soldiers to their enlistment.

Essentially, Iraqi soldiers can quit the Army whenever they want with no repercussions.

“How many Marines would we have if they could leave anytime before their enlistment was up or not return when they are home on pre/post deployment leave, with no repercussions for quitting or deserting?” asked Lovejoy, who added that food supplies are not delivered as frequently as they should be to Iraqi soldiers in Haditha.

“The battalion is supposed to have food delivered every 10 days,” he said. “This battalion has not had any food delivered by the national maintenance contract (food contractor) in 15 days.”

In fact, 2nd Brigade added 140 soldiers to its rosters in last month. The batch of new soldiers was the most the Brigade has received in four months.

The addition puts the brigade at about 60-percent of its total allocated manpower, according to Branigan.

Furthermore, the new batch of soldiers arrived already trained in their military occupational specialties – cooks, mechanics, administrators, and truck drivers, to name a few.

“Hopefully this will be enough to stabilize us, and I think it will be,” said Branigan. “The more we get here already trained, then the less they (Iraqi soldiers) have to worry about.”

Since the new soldiers are already trained in their occupational specialties, the Marines don’t have to spend time training the new soldiers, which can take weeks, said Branigan.

The problems the Iraqi Army faces stem from the fact that Iraq is still a new democracy, with a new government, with leaders who are still learning how to support Iraqi Security Forces, said Lovejoy, who describes the Iraqi Army during Saddam Hussein’s regime as “social/job program for Iraqi military-aged males.”

But as pay, leave and other logistical and administrative challenges continue to dissolve for Iraq’s soldiers, more attention and effort can be put into training Iraqi soldiers at all levels, such as staff officers learning operational planning and Jundis leading patrols through city streets.

“The IA (Iraqi Army) are not Marines,” said Lovejoy. “They come from a different culture, educational background, and have not had the benefit from having graduated from one of the world’s toughest boot camp(s)…or infantry training regimens.”

Still, progress is continuous, though measured, at all levels of the Iraqi Army in western Al Anbar Province, the Marines say.

“They (Iraqi soldiers) are forming and learning while actively participating in an armed struggle,” said Bunch. “It is the ultimate OJT (on-the-job training) – and it is challenging.”

In Hit, Iraqi soldiers who patrol daily alongside U.S. soldiers are having more interaction with the local community, and are learning “to be more deliberate and discriminate in their use of force,” said Bunch.

Furthermore, the battalion’s staff officers are getting better at coordinating amongst themselves, as well as using and sharing information to analyze and plan future military operations, said Bunch, edging them closer to functioning as an integrated military staff.

Similar progress is on-going in the brigade’s other two battalions, where Iraqi soldiers are partnered with U.S. military units.

In Haditha, Iraqi soldiers routinely integrate U.S. Marine vehicles and units into Iraqi Army-led convoys, reducing the number of Marine convoys needed to transport supplies and equipment, for example. Furthermore, Iraqi soldiers, who have served alongside American Marines there for months, are manning checkpoints, leading convoys, and collecting invaluable intelligence for use in counterinsurgency operations, said Lovejoy.

“The new Iraqi Army is being shaped by U.S. military standards,” said Lovejoy. “Our ways are a revolutionary change for soldiers who served in Saddam’s army.”

Excellant article.
"n Haditha, the Brigade’s 2nd Battalion has also had numerous successes in the past half year: The battalion has conducted 10 independent, company-sized military operations and conducts all of its own convoys, supplying food, water and ammunition to its companies."
Sounds like this BN is shortly going to be classified at level one if not already so.
Things really have been panning out very well, as this article illustrates. One must consider that a similiar transformation has taken place in every province the US and British military is operating in.
Eventually those large Iraqi military depots/logistic centers in the south should be able to fully outfit each Iraqi soldier with a full compliment of gear, as well as provide adequate armor and vehicles.
One only wonders how well their fledging airforce is coming along. We may start reading about Iraqi choppers providing their army units with air cover one of these days.

Articles like this one make me think that Saddam's armed forces were 50-100 years out of date. They may have had some modern weapons, but they were trained to be "cannon fodder". Shoot until you get killed, and since that won't be long, we don't have to take care of you.

Our forces are doing a superb job of modernizing the Iraqi forces. That's a long haul that we couldn't have expected.

Reading some of the stuff about how Iraqi army recruits are mowed down or kidnapped and beheaded, we gotsa believe there is a core of true - and extremely brave - patriots there.....may they prevail.

"Our forces are doing a superb job of modernizing the Iraqi forces."
They truly are. And this is why for some time I and some others have attempted to counter what often Freepers would say in regards of us originally screwing up in not just hiring the Iraqi Army back in 2004.
It was shortly tried and found to be ridiculus. And that is when it was decided we would have to build from scratch a new army and security police force for them. It has been paying off in big dividends for the past half year or so.

this is why for some time I and some others have attempted to counter what often Freepers would say in regards of us originally screwing up in not just hiring the Iraqi Army back in 2004.

There's plenty of evidence now to show that you are correct. A lot of people believed that the Iraqi army was formidable. What a joke! They were a rag-tag bunch of conscripts who had guns.

Our guys have had to build an Iraqi army from scratch, and like everything else they do, they're doing a fine job.

The evidence was available back then. I would point to well documented articles by military officers that laid out the details. People just did not want to listen nor analyse what was voiced. At any rate, that is ok. We are seeing the fruit now being bear from those seeds we planted back in late 2004.

The evidence was available back then.

That's true. I saw it, and wanted to believe it. But when there's so much political nonsense (on both sides) being thrown around, it's not a good idea just to believe what you want.
I tend to hope what I want to believe is true, but wait for proof. In this case, I think the proof is undeniable.

Yes. I am just glad it really has worked out as well as it has. So much is not put to print for general consumption as how we have worked with them. I don't blame anyone for doubting earlier on. Bottom line is, IMHO, our military continue to meet it's objectives.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.