Are you kidding? The Dems. and their media lapdogs are loving the violence in Iraq which no matter how much it has Al Qaeda's handiwork written all over it they label as "sectarian violence." This is the media/Democrats' new mantra. Label all terrorist violence "sectarian" and part of an emerging civil war. Americans will be far less likely to support continuing on in Iraq if it's a civil war than if we're combatting terrorists. So the Dem and media scum just throw it all into the same bucket now calling it "Sectarian" violence.
One question, why were the Dems. all for us getting in the middle of a REAL civil war back during the Clinton years in the Balkans, but suddenly being in one that's only a civil war based on their labelling is bad?? So preventing sectarian violence was an important security imperative in the 90s in Chirac and Schroeder's war in Kosovo but doing so now in Iraq is bad??? Someone care to explain this latest Dem inconsistency??
Just wait til you see what I put up next.
The answer is easy, anything a Dem President Does is Good; anything a Rep Pres Does is Bad. That's their mind-set.