Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hellbender
Physicists and cosmologists think that tiny changes in a number of fundamental physical constants (like the charge of the electron, etc.) would have resulted a universe in which life of any kind would be impossible.

Life of any kind? I doubt that physicists would say that. Life as far as we are aware of it existing? Sure. Life of any kind? Doubtful. We are still finding life on earth where experts didn't think life was possible - near underwater volcano vents for example...
100 posted on 08/01/2006 4:26:00 PM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Stone Mountain

Read my posts. I said that minor changes in some fundamental qualities would lead to a universe which would never expand, or to one which is all energy--not even any stars, let alone planets, organic matter, etc. How do you get life if there's nothing but light out there?
This is not my theory, or that of creationists. It's a problem physicists and cosmologists have thought about a great deal. They refer to the "anthropic principle," meaning that the universe just happens to be set up to allow us to appear, and to understand it.


109 posted on 08/01/2006 4:51:08 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: Stone Mountain

"We are still finding life on earth where experts didn't think life was possible..."

I'm a little late to this conversation, but you may be interested in the book 'Life As We Do Not Know It', by Peter Ward (biologist at U of Wash).


379 posted on 08/02/2006 9:44:28 PM PDT by stormer (Get your bachelors, masters, or doctorate now at home in your spare time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson