[Darkwolf377]

in which 12-year-old actress Dakota Fanning reportedly is violently raped

Unnecessary hysteria--she plays a character who is raped, as the next paragraph explains. As in pretend. The lead paragraph should be clarified.

[msnimje]

Unnecessary hysteria--she plays a character who is raped, as the next paragraph explains. As in pretend. The lead paragraph should be clarified.

Do you not like children?

[af_vet_1981]

Unnecessary hysteria--she plays a character who is raped, as the next paragraph explains. As in pretend. The lead paragraph should be clarified.

Hang them anyway.

[Oztrich Boy]

But isn't it good to know there's a shortage of actual crime in Wilmington. NC?

[AFreeBird]

Unnecessary hysteria--she plays a character who is raped, as the next paragraph explains. As in pretend. The lead paragraph should be clarified.

Okay, it's bad enough that there are actual people out there that do such things to kids; so do we really need to show it to a whole bunch of new prospective sickos?

And I can't even begin to imagine what it does to the mind of a 12 year old girl - actress or not.

[Recovering Ex-hippie]

It is still child porn. Why would this be different than any child porn n the internet with "pretend " actors?

It is porn if it shows a child being raped or in provocative sexual scenes..doesn't matter if its "acted" or photshopped. So..... as long as an "artistic " small film company puts out the film...it is now not pornography?

as for the parents, they don't give a hoot about this child...they know, money or not, she will be even more in demand for the money films after this outrage.

[JSDude1]

I don't care, they whole idea is sickining, not too mention what it is going to dot to poor litte Dakota (one of the most talented child-actors today in my opinion..)

My Question: "When did we loose or consciences?".