To: GeronL
You wrote, "There will be FReepers who will be okay with this I am sure..."
Where in the world did that come from? Anyone equipped with even the most rudimentary moral sense would view the harvesting of unborn children for cosmetic treatments as something vile beyond measure. Even the staunchest pro-choice advocates would have a hard time defending such an awful practice, and if you haven't noticed, Free Republic isn't exactly a haven for pro-choice advocates.
Frankly, though, I'm doubtful of the claim of the article. It's seems simply too horror movie-like to be true.
To: Rembrandt_fan
we have embryonic stem cell research supporters and not just with existing lines
18 posted on
08/08/2006 8:17:57 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
To: Rembrandt_fan
There are FReepers who defend kiddie porn with the "art" defense.
21 posted on
08/08/2006 8:20:25 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://www.mises.org/story/1975 <--no such thing as a fairtax)
To: Rembrandt_fan
You ought to pay a bit closer attention ... many here at FR do not believe a human being is there in the womb at early age. There are many at FR who are okay with harvesting embryos for their body parts ... by extension, this heinous utilization isn't going to actually bother them. If the harvesting for dissection were in the eighth or ninth month, well, maybe that would bother them, but even that can be rationalized away if it helps someone older.
23 posted on
08/08/2006 8:23:08 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: Rembrandt_fan
I agree with you, I think this article is bad exaggeration.
24 posted on
08/08/2006 8:23:20 PM PDT by
sig226
(There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who do not.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson