Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqis improve defenses, border forts
Multi-National Forces-Iraq ^ | Staff Sgt Lucia Newman

Posted on 08/09/2006 4:28:24 PM PDT by SandRat

The Sulaminiyah province is the last province in Iraq to complete the $161 million border fort construction project funded by Coalition forces.
The Sulaminiyah province is the last province in Iraq to complete the $161 million border fort construction project funded by Coalition forces.
Story by U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt Lucia Newman
Multi-National Security Transition Command - Iraq

BAGHDAD
-- Iraqi forces believe that in order to secure what’s on the inside, you have to secure what’s on the outside.
Iraq’s border forts have been constructed to do just that. According to the Department of Border Enforcement, the forts are in place to deter, disrupt and interdict cross-border movement of contraband, illegal aliens and insurgent support.

U.S. Army Lt. Col. Theodore Price, a Civilian Police Assistance Training Team chief, said the forts are used as Iraq’s first layer of defense in support of the nation’s fight against terrorism.

“They are used as a means of preventing foreign fighters and smugglers from entering or leaving the country,” Price said.

Since June 2004, the Coalition has funded 258 border forts throughout nine Iraqi provinces, according to U.S. Air Force Capt. Tara DeVaugh, DBE program manager. The first three forts were built in Al Anbar.

To date, 255 border forts have been completed in the provinces of As Sulaymaniah, Diyala, Wasit, Maysan, Basrah, Al Muthanna, An Najaf, Al Anbar and Ninawa.

By September, an additional three forts located within As Sulaymania and Al Anbar provinces will complete the $161 million project.
“These specific areas were selected by the Iraqi government and Coalition leaders as the best tactical and strategic locations of each border fort,” said Price.

Construction of the forts also comes with many challenges – security and health concerns are contributing factors to slowing down the building process.

“Workers are often threatened by local tribes,” said Price. “Security must then be provided to the contractors, which adds about one third to the cost of the contract. Finally, water for the construction is very scarce, especial in the western region of the country, which leaves the contractor to either bring in water or dig wells.”

Although the challenges have slowed the process, they have not stopped it. U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, Multi-National Security Transition Command - Iraq commanding general, said the new Iraqi government is serious about establishing policies and practices at the legal border crossings to make sure they aren’t points of ingress for illegal entries.

“Iraqi forces will have responsibility for 3,161 kilometers (1,964 miles) of Iraq’s borders,” said Dempsey. “However, it’s a tiered approach that the Iraqi government has chosen to take; border police on the perimeter backed up by the Iraqi Army, backed up by the Coalition.”

According to Price, border forts are also used as logistical and administrative hubs for Iraqi patrol agents.

“A fort is similar to a small forward operating base. It can act as the headquarters for a unit, providing complete life support for those who use it as lodging,” Price said.

Each fort has billeting space for guards and leadership, DeVaugh said. The forts also include shower and bath facilities; office and administration areas; a kitchen; an armory; and observation posts. To keep everything running in the remote locations, each border fort has its own generator with another for backup.

“Border police complete multiple week rotations at a time and the forts are designed to house several guards at any given time to allow for overlap,” Devaugh said.

In addition, prior to Coalition involvement, ports of entry reported independently to the Iraqi senior leadership. Operations and procedures were informal and varied depending on leadership, topography, size and function of the facility.

Today each port of entry is under multi-ministerial control, with various responsibilities, procedures and separate reporting chains.

“Control of the border forces has always been under the MOI (Ministry of Interior),” said Army Maj. John Mulhall, Civilian Police Assistance Training Team. “The Coalition is assisting in the development of a more effective force that will work in partnership with other MOI forces.”
According to Mulhall, Coalition forces are supporting the Iraqi police at many of the border forts.

“The Department of Border Enforcement has an outstanding command structure with great leadership,” Price said. “I am confident that within the course of another six months they will be able to achieve Iraqi self control of the borders with little or no support needed from the Coalition forces.”



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: border; defenses; forts; improve; iraq; iraqis; oif

1 posted on 08/09/2006 4:28:25 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

More improvements in Iraq.


2 posted on 08/09/2006 4:28:59 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

is it me or does that look like a castle complete with crenelations....


3 posted on 08/09/2006 4:43:11 PM PDT by AlextheWise1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AlextheWise1

Yep,... shades of Beau-Geste'!


4 posted on 08/09/2006 4:44:12 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
The Department of Border Enforcement has an outstanding command structure with great leadership,” Price said. “I am confident that within the course of another six months they will be able to achieve Iraqi self control of the borders with little or no support needed from the Coalition forces.”

When they're done, could we ask them to work on our border defense? /s

5 posted on 08/09/2006 4:50:41 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Thanks for that. That is exactly what I was thinking. And I'm also disappointed it took till post 5 to get a US border enforcement reference on this topic.


6 posted on 08/09/2006 4:55:43 PM PDT by steveyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steveyp
I was reticent in making my comment since some FReepers are sensitive about discussing national security in securing our borders.
7 posted on 08/09/2006 5:10:33 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Sure - forts on our border would have stopped the 11 Egyptians who came on student visas and never showed up for school. Not!

You can stop all the Mexican day laborers you want, but they aren't the threat to us that Islamic fanatics are.


8 posted on 08/09/2006 6:01:59 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

Forts stop no one. But if you are not on patrol in 110 degree heat it may be a better place to sleep off duty than out in the open. Also have to have a place to keep all the bodies you snag on patrol, if you haven't already shot them. We should try it on our borders.


9 posted on 08/09/2006 6:43:52 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
Sure - forts on our border would have stopped the 11 Egyptians who came on student visas and never showed up for school. Not!

You can stop all the Mexican day laborers you want, but they aren't the threat to us that Islamic fanatics are.

Why the rant? Did anyone say that a southern border fence would prevent Islamic fanatics from entering the USA? ... Cool your jets.

10 posted on 08/09/2006 6:47:47 PM PDT by Cobra64 (All we get are lame ideas from Republicans and lame criticism from dems about those lame ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson