Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP wins round in tussle to replace Ney
FortWayne.com ^ | 8/10/06 | JOHN McCARTHY

Posted on 08/10/2006 8:01:05 PM PDT by LdSentinal

COLUMBUS, Ohio - The favored candidate to take Rep. Bob Ney's spot on the ticket can legally do so under Ohio law, the state attorney general said Thursday.

Secretary of State Ken Blackwell had sought the opinion from Attorney General Jim Petro as Republicans considered how to replace Ney, who announced this week he would not seek re-election.

State Sen. Joy Padgett is the leading candidate, and would be eligible to enter a special primary or replace Ney on the November ballot, the attorney general said.

Ney, a six-term GOP lawmaker, has come under scrutiny for his ties to Jack Abramoff, a lobbyist at the center of a congressional corruption scandal. Party officials had feared the loss of his seat.

Ney denies wrongdoing and has not been charged.

Ohio's so-called "sore loser" law generally prevents candidates defeated in a primary from running for office in the fall as an independent or write-in. Padgett ran for lieutenant governor this spring with Petro, who lost the GOP nomination for governor to Blackwell.

Padgett's status in the May primary was not covered by the law, and she is free to seek Ney's seat, Petro said. Padgett got on the May ballot by "declaration of candidacy," a term not covered by the law, he said.

Blackwell, as secretary of state, is Ohio's chief elections officer.

Democrats probably will take the case to court once a special election is set or if Padgett is certified for the November ballot, said Brian Rothenberg, spokesman for the state Democratic Party.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ballot; blackwell; candidate; ney; padgett; petro; space; zack

1 posted on 08/10/2006 8:01:06 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
Ohio's so-called "sore loser" law generally prevents candidates defeated in a primary from running for office in the fall as an independent or write-in.

Off topic but seems to apply sore loserman in connecticut.

2 posted on 08/10/2006 8:08:29 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Glad to hear that so far, Ohio will have a Republican candidate that will be PRINTED on the ballot this November, instead of a write-in (like Texas).

You can bet the Dim's will be appealing and hoping to find a Liberal Appeals Court Judge to snuff this out.

3 posted on 08/10/2006 8:11:35 PM PDT by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson