[Antoninus]

ID isn't a scientific alternative and therefore needs no discrediting.

Tell me, is ToE falsifiable? If so, how would we do it? If not, how can you claim that it's a science any more valid than ID?

[dread78645]

Tell me, is ToE falsifiable? If so, how would we do it?

A rabbit (or any mammal for that matter) fossil in the Cambrian shales.
A true chimera (centaurs, mermaids, griffins). Combinations from different lineages. An Intelligent Designer could put a human torso on horses & fishes and wings on lions. Right?
A shark with a vestigial pelvis (like we find in whales and porpoises).

Produce one of the above and fame awaits you.

[freedumb2003]

Thank you for your answer. Sadly, it is a strawman. My statement was that ID was not science. Your response is, I gather, that TToE isn't either.

Rather than open a second line of argumentation, I would first like to conclude this one. TToE's status is irrelevant to the discussion of ID's status.

May we please agree that ID is not science before bifurcating the discussion?