Posted on 08/16/2006 9:50:04 AM PDT by Abathar
No problem here!
Alternative lifestyle translates into anal sex for men with resulting hemorrhoids and cunnilingus with women resulting in herpes and bad breath. Humanity needs saving from its ownself. Good grief!
You know, considering the subject matter, another writer would have phrased that differently...
Notice that Ritter called her comments everything but inaccurate and untrue. Oopsy! The dhimmie's Freudian slip is showing again.
I don't see it, either. I guess Bob's holding onto his cash and following the conventional wisdom that nobody pays attention to the race until after Labor Day.
Yeah, my favorite cow was starting to look at me sideways.
See below for my response about a parent marrying his child. Siblings getting married may be a result of childhood abuse. As such, it is best to not allow that to prevent abuse.
Or, how about two men and a woman or two women and a man?
Not my thing, but I am not about to force my will on others.
How about a father and his daughter? Or, a father and his son?
This borders on sex with minors. A parent who marries his children may have abused them as children (i.e. raised the child to be his sex-slave). This hurts the child.
How about a man and his goat? If a man is in love with his goat, who is to say that such should not be sanctioned? It won't affect you and it won't affect me. If they are happy together, why not? It is not animal abuse. After all, you can kill a goat and eat it. Can someone stop you from having sex with it?
It is animal abuse. While it is legal to kill a goat, it is not legal to torture it. Since a goat can't provide consent to have sex, then a man marrying his goat is technically raping his goat every time he has sexual intercourse. Since sex is implied in marriage, then marriage between humans and animals should be illegal.
I bet the followers of incest from Clinton's hometown felt left out. I weep for their omission.
Only if she can cook along with mowing the lawn ...
Eggzactly what I was thinking...
This is a perfectly legitimate and a good question. The Democrats should answer it.
Well...she's right. Unnatural is unnatural!
you are absolutely correct. And polygamy was sanctioned by the Bible. End of story. Thanks for the rationality.
It is a disorder and an inclination to a particular sin, but only homosexual activity is sin, not the inclination.
(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)
Homosexuals dislike it when you expose the fact they are sexual perverts.
Homosexuals are only about sex. PERIOD.
Comparing homosexual fetishist to those who have a fetish for sex with animals is accurate and precise.
Homosexuality is not a compulsion to arrange flowers and interior decorating.
To all these critics; She wasn't saying the gay livestyle was the same as bestiality---her analogy was stressing that society has limits. But ya know how the libs will be so quick to jump on her because she dared criticize the homosexual agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.