Skip to comments.
Perry's road revolution could take electoral toll
Austin American-Statesman ^
| August 20, 2006
| Ben Wear
Posted on 08/20/2006 1:54:13 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Taking the right turn
Posted on Sun, Aug. 20, 2006
Star-Telegram
Dallas-Fort Worth area leaders spoke with a powerful, united voice. And they quite obviously were heard.
The result was a major victory for North Central Texas in terms of meeting its long-range transportation needs and helping to ensure that the economy remains robust in decades to come.
Thanks to those harmonic voices, both Texas Transportation Commission Chairman Ric Williamson and Gov. Rick Perry now support the incorporation of a crucial alternative regional proposal into the proposed routing of the Trans-Texas Corridor in the Metroplex.
Local elected officials and transportation planners were firmly united against a preliminary Texas Department of Transportation proposal to swing a primary leg of the corridor around eastern Dallas County, thereby snubbing the western half of the Metroplex.
Local leaders instead favor a much more logical proposal to have the corridor run up the middle of the Metroplex from the south via an extended Texas 360 and on to Dallas/Fort Worth Airport. They also favor constructing an east-west corridor at the southern edge of the region and looping it northward around the west side of Fort Worth and the east side of Dallas. The loop's transportation modes could include passenger cars and vehicles, rail freight and 18-wheelers.
Local elected officials merit praise for vigorously touting the alternative proposal in recent TxDOT public hearings and other forums. Fort Worth Mayor Mike Moncrief, Tarrant County Commissioner Glen Whitley and Dallas City Councilman Bill Blaydes were particularly effective.
Transportation planners at the North Central Texas Council of Governments, led by Michael Morris, deserve kudos for helping develop and explain the regional alternative, which would do far more to alleviate gridlock and foster a strong economy than the preliminary TxDOT proposal.
And thanks are due Williamson and Perry for listening to the region's concerns and taking them seriously.
That's what democratic government is supposed to be all about.
www.keeptexasmoving.org
To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; AprilfromTexas; ...
Trans-Texas Corridor PING!
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
finally a reasonable explanation of this program.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I do not know of anyone who is in favor of this.
4
posted on
08/20/2006 2:10:17 PM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Hydroshock
I do not know of anyone who is in favor of this.
You need to expand your horizon of people you know.
5
posted on
08/20/2006 2:13:25 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
I do not know of anyone who is in favor of this.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You need to expand your horizon of people you know.
Yup
6
posted on
08/20/2006 2:16:06 PM PDT
by
jf55510
To: deport
You need to expand yours as well.
7
posted on
08/20/2006 2:16:30 PM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
While the Bell, Friedman, Strayhorn cartel work feverishly to spike the program and admit that the lawsuits will pile up; nobody has spoken the most important words.
Railroad Commission of Texas
http://www.rrc.state.tx.us/about/index.html
Since this project includes railway and utility pipelines, it is not all about tollroads and passenger cars. The reason for all of the deflection about a "land grab" is to obscure what is really happening. Throw in foreign investment, connecting to Mexico, and claim that jobs will evaporate. Before researching the published information available from the State of Texas, it is easy to be against this project based on media soundbites. If Texans will study the information, it shows to be a viable plan. Not perfect, but viable. The other option is to make fun of the governors hair while we sit in traffic.
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Local leaders instead favor a much more logical proposal to have the corridor run up the middle of the Metroplex from the south via an extended Texas 360 and on to Dallas/Fort Worth Airport. Thus putting the road where the most traffic is now (it will be fun during construction) and where it will cost the most and disrupt things the most.
9
posted on
08/20/2006 2:18:38 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: deport
You know what would help transportation? Well-planned cities with honest-to-goodness subway systems and park-and-ride commuter rail.
10
posted on
08/20/2006 2:18:52 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(I ha' da Steve Nash DO befo' Steve Nash DID)
To: Hydroshock
I know no one in favor either. I do know some opposed, but they feel that the work is being done by some secret protocol with foreign companies.
11
posted on
08/20/2006 2:19:44 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Hydroshock
You need to expand yours as well.
Why...... you don't seem to be interest in expanding yours?
12
posted on
08/20/2006 2:19:48 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
13
posted on
08/20/2006 2:21:24 PM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: Doctor Stochastic
This is going to cost Gov. Goodhair in November.
14
posted on
08/20/2006 2:22:07 PM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: JohnnyZ
You know what would help transportation? Well-planned cities with honest-to-goodness subway systems and park-and-ride commuter rail.
Yep.... at or at least around the metro areas. But roads are going to be needed for the long haul travel. I have no problem with people using them paying for them. That way my taxes don't go up for them and I only pay if I choose to drive them.
15
posted on
08/20/2006 2:22:59 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Hydroshock
I am all the time.
Keep at it and you'll eventually find some that are far the roadways being built in Texas. Just hang in there and one day you'll be able to ride on one if'n you choose to pay your share otherwise you can ride the existing roadways for free excepting your gasoline tax, etc.
16
posted on
08/20/2006 2:26:13 PM PDT
by
deport
To: Hydroshock; deport
"Can't we all just get along?"
17
posted on
08/20/2006 2:26:46 PM PDT
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: Hydroshock
This is going to cost Gov. Goodhair in November.
Naw...... Gov. Perry will be elected and serve another term. Kinky will finish fourth in a four candidate race.
18
posted on
08/20/2006 2:27:41 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
Like I said I do not k now anyone in over 20 people who support this boondoggle of a road. And many are no longer supporting Gov. Goodhair. This will be an issue in November.
19
posted on
08/20/2006 2:28:07 PM PDT
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: USNBandit
"Can't we all just get along?"
We get along, it's just that a few don't want to let others have the opportunity to ride on toll roads if they so choose. They'd rather tax everyone to build future roads.
Shucks the Studebaker and Conestoga wagon days are gone.
20
posted on
08/20/2006 2:29:46 PM PDT
by
deport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-119 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson