Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigators Comb Site of Plane Crash
Fox News ^ | 27 Aug 06 | AP

Posted on 08/27/2006 10:45:21 AM PDT by stm

LEXINGTON, Ky. — A commuter jet carrying 50 people crashed in a field and caught fire shortly after taking off Sunday morning. Authorities said a crew member was the only survivor.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: mishap; planecrash
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
A terrible tragedy
1 posted on 08/27/2006 10:45:21 AM PDT by stm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stm

I blame the people in the tower - NOT the flight crew!! If the people in the tower actually spent any time looking OUT of those fancy windows they have, they would have seen that he was headed toward the wrong runway and straightened him out.

Instead, they worried more about their coffee than the safety of the people on those planes.


2 posted on 08/27/2006 11:16:35 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

The ultimate safety of the flight falls on the PIC (pilot in command). I have refused several dirctions from the tower that I considered not in my best interest. Better to get a pink slip than a toe tag


3 posted on 08/27/2006 11:21:52 AM PDT by stm (Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Unfortunately, I have to disagree here.

Yes, ATC might possibly have been able to catch the error, based on their workload the and the conditions outside the tower, but it's not something that you can count on.

When you get right down to it, the ultimate responsibility lays with the flight crew (in particular, the captain who's recognized as the Pilot-in-Command). The two pilots had several years of experience, and were apparently familiar with the airport and the route. In addition to that, in the cockpit, they had a facility directory with a taxi map for the airport.

Then there's the fact of the markings and signs posted along the taxiway. And the markings at the runway threshold. Or the bit that blows my mind. The fact that both pilots apparently didn't notice the compass heading was 026 degrees instead of 022 degrees, despite the fact that they'd have checked the reading prior to departure.

The only explanation I can come up with that makes any sense at all is that the either the crew rest period had been violated, and the flight crew was fatigued, or something else had been going on prior to departure.


4 posted on 08/27/2006 11:32:39 AM PDT by Karma313th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Karma313th

Always a chain of events lead to these things. Many contributing factors I'm sure, but PIC is supreme, And runway length is primary pre-flight planning.


5 posted on 08/27/2006 11:35:23 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stm

I saw a drawing of the Lexington runways, taxiways and terminal tarmac area on an earlier FR thread. It looks as if you have to taxi to the end of Runway 26, cross it, and then continue on a short taxi-way to Runway 22. The runways are just 4 degrees different in heading. The take-off was attempted before daylight.

It was certainly the pilot-in-command's responsibility to determine the correct runway but I know both pilots are proceeding through the pre-take-off checklist while taxiing.

The redundancy of two pilots is supposed to help avoid simple human error but does not always get the job done.

There are usually lighted signs next to each runway indicating the runway number which corresponds to the runway heading.

I can see how a simple but fatal mistake could be made in the rush to complete the take-off checklist.

Those who are not pilots have no idea how easy and fast it can be to make a mistake that can kill you and all of your passengers.


6 posted on 08/27/2006 11:41:50 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares

Absolutely, that's the primary reason I didn't agree with putting the blame on ATC. Even assuming clearance delivery inadvertently cleared them for 26, NTSB report would still read "Pilot Error" as the cause of the accident with the ATC error listed as a potentially contributing factor.

And you're right about a chain of events. It's always just mind-boggling to look back afterwards and see how things snowballed when they could've been averted at several points along the timeline, it's the Monday morning quarterbacking thing, I guess.

Who knows, maybe sterile cockpit was violated with some sort of semi-crisis that had the flight crew distracted at the time.


7 posted on 08/27/2006 11:45:54 AM PDT by Karma313th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Karma313th

I agree that the pilots have ultimate command over their aircraft from the time the door is sealed until the time it is opened again. And, I agree that the pilots should be familiar enough with the runway markings to know where they are on a field. That said, they are also busy in the flight station running pre-flight checks and settings so, between the tower and the flight crew, apparently no one was watchinh where they went.

However, those windows in the tower are there for the ground and aircraft controllers to actually look outside. This isn't a GCA facility, it's the tower. They sit up high with a 360 degree view so they can see what is occurring on and around their airport. This is not the first time a controller has screwed up because no one was looking out the window.


8 posted on 08/27/2006 11:48:41 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stm

I believe the news conference stated that the only survivor was the co-pilot...I just hope he survives to tell his tale. Both black boxes were recovered. Also, supposedly there was only one person in the flight tower controlling traffic??? He gave them their runway assignment and wasn't paying attention to insure it was the correct one they lined up on???


9 posted on 08/27/2006 11:48:48 AM PDT by Dr Stormfist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Please see my post #8 to Karma.


10 posted on 08/27/2006 11:51:12 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority

"...Runway 26, cross it, and then continue on a short taxi-way to Runway 22. The runways are just 4 degrees different in heading... "


40 degrees difference. :)


11 posted on 08/27/2006 11:54:13 AM PDT by DaveArk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stm
What a no-brainer.

Airfield Performance: CRJ200 ER FAR required take-off field length (SL, ISA) at MTOW 5,800 feet

Mishap runway length: 3,500 feet

12 posted on 08/27/2006 12:01:42 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stm

Time to Sell...

13 posted on 08/27/2006 12:06:41 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Something should have crossed their minds when they passed the three-board seconds after they came off the brakes.
14 posted on 08/27/2006 12:10:06 PM PDT by stm (Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

person - there was only one controller in the tower.


15 posted on 08/27/2006 12:10:55 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I have not seen any info about the runway that was assigned. Were they told to use another runway and went this one by mistake? I wonder if there was anything unique about today's departure. If not then they've probably taken off from there before and would be aware of a change in runway assignments or their clearance.

At least they stand a good chance of finding out what went wrong though. Both the flight data recorder and the cockpit voice recorder were said to have been recovered.

This will be an interesting one as it unfolds.


16 posted on 08/27/2006 12:43:38 PM PDT by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Karma313th
The only explanation I can come up with that makes any sense at all is that the either the crew rest period had been violated, and the flight crew was fatigued, or something else had been going on prior to departure.

drunk? hungover?

sometimes the "routine" gets your a## killed.

like always looking down the barrel of your .45 after you've pulled the magazine out and making sure there isn't a round in the chamber....over and over, year after year till you're a little distracted, and leave one in the pipe...BAM!

attention to detail. it's a way of life... now 49 people died cause of a simple screw up.

17 posted on 08/27/2006 1:33:47 PM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dick Vomer

Yes, complacency can have a way of coming back to bite you.

Certainly happens often enough, too. Complacency's a close second behind bad judgement for the accidents listed in the NTSB database.

I have a good deal of sympathy for the first officer of the flight. Imagine having to go through life with something like this on your conscience.


18 posted on 08/27/2006 2:19:40 PM PDT by Karma313th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
there was only one controller in the tower.

So, already there is a problem in the tower.
19 posted on 08/27/2006 3:33:59 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr
Were they told to use another runway and went this one by mistake? I wonder if there was anything unique about today's departure. If not then they've probably taken off from there before and would be aware of a change in runway assignments or their clearance.

Yes, they were assigned runwayd 26? It's the longer runway.

As far as commercial pilots go, it is my understanding that they are not supposed to land or take off from an airport that they have not landed or taken off from before. Usually, they have to go in with a check pilot who will make sure that they are familiar with the airport and any unique conditions or restricted areas. In addition to the departure, I haven't seen anything that indicates this was anything but a routine departure.
20 posted on 08/27/2006 3:38:15 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson